Trusted
34,029
edits
Forum:Doctor Who: Worlds in Time: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Do we cover RPGs or not?
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) |
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
{{Quote|Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it's not a role playing game, I'm saying that it doesn't give a lot of freedom to the player, thus making it very easy to write about the game without including info that the player chooses, like name and such.|Myself, just above.}} | {{Quote|Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it's not a role playing game, I'm saying that it doesn't give a lot of freedom to the player, thus making it very easy to write about the game without including info that the player chooses, like name and such.|Myself, just above.}} | ||
:Now, in truth, I never saw why we don't include some RPGs. I mean, hell, I notice we do! I see no marking calling [[Search for the Doctor]] or it's [[:Category:Find your fate novels|series category]] marked as non canon, and that story ALSO includes an unnamed character... (Although arguably I understand that she had a back story and gender) and I notice that an image from it appears in the in-universe part [[Omega]]... | :Now, in truth, I never saw why we don't include some RPGs. I mean, hell, I notice we do! I see no marking calling [[Search for the Doctor]] or it's [[:Category:Find your fate novels|series category]] marked as non canon, and that story ALSO includes an unnamed character... (Although arguably I understand that she had a back story and gender) and I notice that an image from it appears in the in-universe part [[Omega]]... and [[2056]]... | ||
:So, let's look at the official reason we don't call FASA canon... '''"..these [books] sometimes contain histories and other information which conflicts with the television and prose stories."'' That really doesn't fit with this as a reason... Hey, if this is our reason, can we mark [[Lungbarrow]] as non-canon too? | :So, let's look at the official reason we don't call FASA canon... '''"..these [books] sometimes contain histories and other information which conflicts with the television and prose stories."'' That really doesn't fit with this as a reason... Hey, if this is our reason, can we mark [[Lungbarrow]] as non-canon too? | ||
