Bureaucrats, content-moderator, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, threadmoderator
85,404
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[cateogry:inclusion debates]] | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
All of [[Obverse Books]]' [[Iris Wildthyme]] short stories are considered somewhat [[canon]] here and have articles. Before Wildthyme was officially introduced into [[Doctor Who]], she starred in three books - [[Marked For Life]], [[Does It Show?]] and [[Could It Be Magic?]] by [[Vintage Books]]. These books contain no references to the DWU beyond Wildthyme being implied to be a [[Time Lord]], but neither do the Obverse anthologies. Why, then, don't we have articles on the Vintage Wildthyme books? Is it just because no one could be bothered creating them/didn't know the books exist? Or was it because of some authorisation or canon debate? Either way, I think we should either create pages for the books, or delete the pages for the Obverse anthologies. I'm in favour for the former. [[User:Bigredrabbit|The preceding comment was made by Bigredrabbit]] ('''[[User talk:Bigredrabbit|talk to me]]''') 11:58, February 23, 2012 (UTC) | All of [[Obverse Books]]' [[Iris Wildthyme]] short stories are considered somewhat [[canon]] here and have articles. Before Wildthyme was officially introduced into [[Doctor Who]], she starred in three books - [[Marked For Life]], [[Does It Show?]] and [[Could It Be Magic?]] by [[Vintage Books]]. These books contain no references to the DWU beyond Wildthyme being implied to be a [[Time Lord]], but neither do the Obverse anthologies. Why, then, don't we have articles on the Vintage Wildthyme books? Is it just because no one could be bothered creating them/didn't know the books exist? Or was it because of some authorisation or canon debate? Either way, I think we should either create pages for the books, or delete the pages for the Obverse anthologies. I'm in favour for the former. [[User:Bigredrabbit|The preceding comment was made by Bigredrabbit]] ('''[[User talk:Bigredrabbit|talk to me]]''') 11:58, February 23, 2012 (UTC) |
edits