Bureaucrats, content-moderator, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, threadmoderator
85,404
edits
Forum:David Campbell and others' upgrade to companion: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:David Campbell and others' upgrade to companion (edit)
Revision as of 20:25, 2 May 2012
, 2 May 2012no edit summary
Mini-mitch (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[category:policy changers]][[category:category issues]] | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
[[David Campbell]], [[Samantha Briggs]], [[Marco Polo]], [[Bret Vyon]] and other, more obscure characters, like ones from "[[The Keys of Marinus]]", have now gotten upgraded to single adventure companions of their respective Doctors. can we get a consensus for/against this? to me it really does seem like stretching the definition of companion (and beyond) its utmost limits.--[[Special:Contributions/24.61.10.36|24.61.10.36]]<sup>[[User talk:24.61.10.36#top|talk to me]]</sup> 22:41, January 30, 2012 (UTC) | [[David Campbell]], [[Samantha Briggs]], [[Marco Polo]], [[Bret Vyon]] and other, more obscure characters, like ones from "[[The Keys of Marinus]]", have now gotten upgraded to single adventure companions of their respective Doctors. can we get a consensus for/against this? to me it really does seem like stretching the definition of companion (and beyond) its utmost limits.--[[Special:Contributions/24.61.10.36|24.61.10.36]]<sup>[[User talk:24.61.10.36#top|talk to me]]</sup> 22:41, January 30, 2012 (UTC) | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::I have already suggested to [[User:Tangerineduel]] that with the random individuals being added to the categories of companions, allies and enemies, we completely strip the categories so we have nothing in them and we have a discussion, per Doctor, of who is a companion, ally and enemy. It will be time-taking, but we may finally get somewhere. [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 09:45, January 31, 2012 (UTC) | ::I have already suggested to [[User:Tangerineduel]] that with the random individuals being added to the categories of companions, allies and enemies, we completely strip the categories so we have nothing in them and we have a discussion, per Doctor, of who is a companion, ally and enemy. It will be time-taking, but we may finally get somewhere. [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 09:45, January 31, 2012 (UTC) | ||
==Archivist's notes== | |||
This was part of a series of threads in late 2011/early 2012 which eventually resulted in the dramatic thinning of companion categories and the complete elimination of "x Doctor allies" and "x Doctor enemies" categories. See also [[Forum:Enemies, intention and association]], [[Forum:What makes an ally and an enemy?]] and [[Forum:What counts as an enemy?]] {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">20:25: Wed 02 May 2012 </span> | |||
