765,429
edits
No edit summary |
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-[Ff]orum archives header +archive)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[Category:Discussions without clear resolution]] | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
I'd like to get a ruling on a silly question. I'm wondering how best to apply [[:Category:20th century individuals]] and [[:Category:21st century individuals]] to people from the present day. For example, we've seen [[Sarah Jane Smith]] and [[Amy Pond]] living in both centuries on-screen, so they'd qualify for both categories. However, other individuals might qualify by sheer arithmetic. Should every 21st century individual from 2010 who is more than nine years old also be categorised a 20th century individual? Or should we keep things simple by limiting the categories to only the known data, by only using years actually portrayed on-screen? [[User:Rob T Firefly|Rob T Firefly]] 18:00, May 11, 2010 (UTC) | I'd like to get a ruling on a silly question. I'm wondering how best to apply [[:Category:20th century individuals]] and [[:Category:21st century individuals]] to people from the present day. For example, we've seen [[Sarah Jane Smith]] and [[Amy Pond]] living in both centuries on-screen, so they'd qualify for both categories. However, other individuals might qualify by sheer arithmetic. Should every 21st century individual from 2010 who is more than nine years old also be categorised a 20th century individual? Or should we keep things simple by limiting the categories to only the known data, by only using years actually portrayed on-screen? [[User:Rob T Firefly|Rob T Firefly]] 18:00, May 11, 2010 (UTC) |