Trusted, emailconfirmed, threadmoderator
41,285
edits
Forum:DWM issues: please help (re)write leads: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
:::Yes, it really is. You're confused because you've got your facts wrong on just about every count. Cover date of 419 is 31 March; of 420 it's 28 April. (If our site is agreeing with you, then we have an even bigger problem with DWM pages.) And your description of the contents is ''way'' off. 419 has very little series 5 coverage at all. What you're characterising as a series 5 "preview" is actually an interview with the non-Moffat exec producers. And 420 ''previews'' TEH through F&S. It doesn't ''review'' anything (other than CD stuff). So actually 419 and 420 prove that the cover date is the "last day valid". If it were the first day of release, then it would make no sense to be ''previewing'' TEH, because TEH had already premiered by 28 April. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">23:02: Sun 06 May 2012 </span> | :::Yes, it really is. You're confused because you've got your facts wrong on just about every count. Cover date of 419 is 31 March; of 420 it's 28 April. (If our site is agreeing with you, then we have an even bigger problem with DWM pages.) And your description of the contents is ''way'' off. 419 has very little series 5 coverage at all. What you're characterising as a series 5 "preview" is actually an interview with the non-Moffat exec producers. And 420 ''previews'' TEH through F&S. It doesn't ''review'' anything (other than CD stuff). So actually 419 and 420 prove that the cover date is the "last day valid". If it were the first day of release, then it would make no sense to be ''previewing'' TEH, because TEH had already premiered by 28 April. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">23:02: Sun 06 May 2012 </span> | ||
::::Oh, lord, I just went to [[DWM 419]] and its saying that the cover date is [[4 March]], which is ''wholly'' wrong. It says 31 March 2010 clear as day on the cover. Okay, at this point, ''nothing'' about our DWM dates should be regarded as true. We need to absolutely verify '''by looking at each and every cover''' each and every date. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">23:05: Sun 06 May 2012 </span> | ::::Oh, lord, I just went to [[DWM 419]] and its saying that the cover date is [[4 March]], which is ''wholly'' wrong. It says 31 March 2010 clear as day on the cover. Okay, at this point, ''nothing'' about our DWM dates should be regarded as true. We need to absolutely verify '''by looking at each and every cover''' each and every date. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">23:05: Sun 06 May 2012 </span> | ||
:::: Incidentally, I've been overwriting pages with the second solution with that of the first. The first type felt a lot clearer to me. -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 21:28, May 9, 2012 (UTC) | |||
