Bureaucrats, content-moderator, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, threadmoderator
85,404
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Yea I went and did some looking into the stories; and that is the only answer I could come up with. I suppose that Shada might get some kind of special treatment somewhere down the line.[[Special:Contributions/68.43.83.92|68.43.83.92]]<sup>[[User talk:68.43.83.92#top|talk to me]]</sup> 05:15, July 14, 2012 (UTC) | Yea I went and did some looking into the stories; and that is the only answer I could come up with. I suppose that Shada might get some kind of special treatment somewhere down the line.[[Special:Contributions/68.43.83.92|68.43.83.92]]<sup>[[User talk:68.43.83.92#top|talk to me]]</sup> 05:15, July 14, 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Oh wow, I never noticed that before. '''Our numbering scheme is wrong.''' ''Shada'' definitely ''is'' 109. Numbering is a production thing, and from a production standpoint, ''Shada'' exists. It has a production code which remains honored to this day, so therefore it is a "real" story in the order. That's why our "made next/made prev" navigation honors ''Shada''. | |||
:Our numbering scheme should ''definitely'' honor ''Shada'' as 109. It's completely wrong that ''Shada'' isn't even on our [[list of Doctor Who television stories]]. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">21:24: Sun 15 Jul 2012 </span> |
edits