Forum:Story Numbering: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:


Yea I went and did some looking into the stories; and that is the only answer I could come up with. I suppose that Shada might get some kind of special treatment somewhere down the line.[[Special:Contributions/68.43.83.92|68.43.83.92]]<sup>[[User talk:68.43.83.92#top|talk to me]]</sup> 05:15, July 14, 2012 (UTC)
Yea I went and did some looking into the stories; and that is the only answer I could come up with. I suppose that Shada might get some kind of special treatment somewhere down the line.[[Special:Contributions/68.43.83.92|68.43.83.92]]<sup>[[User talk:68.43.83.92#top|talk to me]]</sup> 05:15, July 14, 2012 (UTC)
:Oh wow, I never noticed that before.  '''Our numbering scheme is wrong.''' ''Shada'' definitely ''is'' 109.  Numbering is a production thing, and from a production standpoint, ''Shada'' exists.  It has a production code which remains honored to this day, so therefore it is a "real" story in the order.  That's why our "made next/made prev" navigation honors ''Shada''.   
:Our numbering scheme should ''definitely'' honor ''Shada'' as 109.  It's completely wrong that ''Shada'' isn't even on our [[list of Doctor Who television stories]].  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">21:24: Sun&nbsp;15 Jul 2012&nbsp;</span>
85,404

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.