1,805
edits
No edit summary |
Icecreamdif (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
:::::Some of the episodes were mishandled, too. The destruction of Ganger-Amy at the end of ''The Almost People'' is an example. Ganger-Amy wasn't an independent individual but the story had spent a huge amount of time establishing that other gangers were. It needed to be very, very clear that Ganger-Amy was different, so the Doctor wasn't committing murder, and it was not clear at all. The story logic was actually there but the emotional presentation failed badly. --[[Special:Contributions/89.242.76.231|89.242.76.231]]<sup>[[User talk:89.242.76.231#top|talk to me]]</sup> 09:02, July 20, 2012 (UTC) | :::::Some of the episodes were mishandled, too. The destruction of Ganger-Amy at the end of ''The Almost People'' is an example. Ganger-Amy wasn't an independent individual but the story had spent a huge amount of time establishing that other gangers were. It needed to be very, very clear that Ganger-Amy was different, so the Doctor wasn't committing murder, and it was not clear at all. The story logic was actually there but the emotional presentation failed badly. --[[Special:Contributions/89.242.76.231|89.242.76.231]]<sup>[[User talk:89.242.76.231#top|talk to me]]</sup> 09:02, July 20, 2012 (UTC) | ||
::::::I think the main problem with the Gangers two parter was that there just wasn't enough story for that to be in two parts. I think they made it clear that the Doctor had no choice but to disconnect the Ganger from Amy, but that whole story just wasn't interesting enough to be a two parter. They should have made that a single episode and then made ''The Wedding of River Song'' a two parter.[[User:Icecreamdif|Icecreamdif]] [[User talk:Icecreamdif|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:37, July 21, 2012 (UTC) |
edits