Bureaucrats, content-moderator, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, threadmoderator
85,404
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
::::While it was ''produced'' it wasn't televised. | ::::While it was ''produced'' it wasn't televised. | ||
::::So if it's included shouldn't it be under the "Other" title along with [[The Pilot Episode]]? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 07:20, July 21, 2012 (UTC) | ::::So if it's included shouldn't it be under the "Other" title along with [[The Pilot Episode]]? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 07:20, July 21, 2012 (UTC) | ||
:It's not really akin to [[the Pilot Episode]], though. The "pilot" was a dress rehearsal of "An Unearthly Child", not a separate story. Its production code was wrenched from it and applied to the later take. And the "pilot" doesn't force a numerical gap in the home video release numbering. ''Shada'' is a totally different situation. When it does get released to DVD, and we all know it will, it'll be numbered 109. We should just face up to that and start renumbering the stories, since it must tediously be done manually. We can then say at [[List of Doctor Who television stories]], "Hey, we know the "Mighty 200" poll doesn't count ''Shada'' or 7A-7D as separate stories, but we do, because 2|Entertain/BBC Video does." At the end of the day, BBC Worldwide is a higher source of information than DWM. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">01:39: Wed 25 Jul 2012 </span> |
edits