Bureaucrats, content-moderator, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, threadmoderator
85,404
edits
Forum:Should we still be trying to cover merchandise?: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Should we still be trying to cover merchandise? (edit)
Revision as of 17:41, 14 August 2012
, 14 August 2012no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[category:Failed proposals]] | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
When this wiki first started, we were the only DW wiki at Wikia (well, WikiCities, to be precise). So we started covering all aspects of DW, including merchandise. But now that the group at the ''Doctor Who'' Collectors' Wiki have stayed the course and created a functioning, thriving wiki ''dedicated'' to merchandise, I'm wondering if we really need our merchandising content any more. Do you think it's reasonable to say that our primary focus is narrative and to just let DWCW handle all the merchandise? | When this wiki first started, we were the only DW wiki at Wikia (well, WikiCities, to be precise). So we started covering all aspects of DW, including merchandise. But now that the group at the ''Doctor Who'' Collectors' Wiki have stayed the course and created a functioning, thriving wiki ''dedicated'' to merchandise, I'm wondering if we really need our merchandising content any more. Do you think it's reasonable to say that our primary focus is narrative and to just let DWCW handle all the merchandise? | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:::DWCW's articles are a fairly clinical, just the facts sort of arrangement, which is good for the info they're presenting. But we on this wiki can go more in depth, or more of an overview and we're able to frame the subject of the articles with more information as is done with the intro to our Bred for War article. | :::DWCW's articles are a fairly clinical, just the facts sort of arrangement, which is good for the info they're presenting. But we on this wiki can go more in depth, or more of an overview and we're able to frame the subject of the articles with more information as is done with the intro to our Bred for War article. | ||
:::I think the two wikis function well together as we deal with information in different ways. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 05:41, July 23, 2012 (UTC) | :::I think the two wikis function well together as we deal with information in different ways. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 05:41, July 23, 2012 (UTC) | ||
== Closing == | |||
Despite efforts to attract more participants to this discussion by going over to the DWCW's forums, nothing much has materialised here. Closing as a failed proposal. Merchandise is therefore still very much an active topic for us. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">17:41: Tue 14 Aug 2012 </span> | |||
