Talk:Eleventh Doctor/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Sorry for having to do this, but I'm being forced to change my sig, and clean up after it, by Wikia Staff
m (Reverted edits by Kranitoko (talk | block) to last version by CzechOut)
m (Sorry for having to do this, but I'm being forced to change my sig, and clean up after it, by Wikia Staff)
Line 15: Line 15:
::However, if you want to replace, I don't really care, as long as the replacement is an equal closeup, of equal dimensions and clarity.  I think, though, you'll be rather hard-pressed to find a closeup that's as well framed or in quite as good natural light. Take a look at the pics of all other Doctors.  The shot has to be a ''true'' "hero" closeup moment, where the head fills the frame.   
::However, if you want to replace, I don't really care, as long as the replacement is an equal closeup, of equal dimensions and clarity.  I think, though, you'll be rather hard-pressed to find a closeup that's as well framed or in quite as good natural light. Take a look at the pics of all other Doctors.  The shot has to be a ''true'' "hero" closeup moment, where the head fills the frame.   


::Until such time as an alternative is found, however, please leave pic 1 in place. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">14:54: Fri&nbsp;20 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>
::Until such time as an alternative is found, however, please leave pic 1 in place. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}14:54: Fri&nbsp;20 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>
:::Just to clarify, administratively we have in the past sometimes removed an image until the bone of contention is settled.  However this was in cases where a whole raft of users had competing ideas on which pic to use, and also when the resulting picture was a "collage" that had to be constructed.  In this case, it seems to be mostly Memnarc's view that the current pic is somehow "Gollumesque" that's driving things.  One person cannot hold a page "hostage" and end up depriving it of its infobox pic, especially on the page of the current star of the show! So we'll hold at [[:file:ElevenHeroCloseup.jpg]] until Memnarc can provide something of equal quality here on the talk page. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">15:05: Fri&nbsp;20 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>
:::Just to clarify, administratively we have in the past sometimes removed an image until the bone of contention is settled.  However this was in cases where a whole raft of users had competing ideas on which pic to use, and also when the resulting picture was a "collage" that had to be constructed.  In this case, it seems to be mostly Memnarc's view that the current pic is somehow "Gollumesque" that's driving things.  One person cannot hold a page "hostage" and end up depriving it of its infobox pic, especially on the page of the current star of the show! So we'll hold at [[:file:ElevenHeroCloseup.jpg]] until Memnarc can provide something of equal quality here on the talk page. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}15:05: Fri&nbsp;20 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>
[[File:Eleventh_doc_main_img2.jpg|thumb|Image 3]]
[[File:Eleventh_doc_main_img2.jpg|thumb|Image 3]]
::::Although I would argue that Image 2 is just as close up as the Tenth Doctor's current image, I'll digress, as I think Image 3 is better representative of the Eleventh Doctor. While I can't say I recall many instances of the "tentative" smile CzechOut described, the smug grin he displays in Image 3 is very indicative of Matt Smith. Plus, if it's good enough for the main Doctor article, why wouldn't it be good enough for the Eleventh Doctor article? [[User:Memnarc|Memnarc]] <sup>[[User talk:Memnarc|talk to me]]</sup> 20:52, April 20, 2012 (UTC)
::::Although I would argue that Image 2 is just as close up as the Tenth Doctor's current image, I'll digress, as I think Image 3 is better representative of the Eleventh Doctor. While I can't say I recall many instances of the "tentative" smile CzechOut described, the smug grin he displays in Image 3 is very indicative of Matt Smith. Plus, if it's good enough for the main Doctor article, why wouldn't it be good enough for the Eleventh Doctor article? [[User:Memnarc|Memnarc]] <sup>[[User talk:Memnarc|talk to me]]</sup> 20:52, April 20, 2012 (UTC)
:::::Pic1 is a closer closeup.  I'm sure you can actually see that.  Look how much of the frame in Pic2 is ''not'' Matt Smith. Pic3 is disqualified ''precisely because'' it already serves as the infobox image at [[the Doctor]].  There's no need for duplication.  And it's not as closeup nor as bright as Pic1.  Remember, the goal of an infobox pic is to be as big as possible, as bright as possible, and as clear as possible. Pic3 just isn't an ''improvement'' on Pic1 in any of these regards.  Keep looking.  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">21:31: Fri&nbsp;20 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>
:::::Pic1 is a closer closeup.  I'm sure you can actually see that.  Look how much of the frame in Pic2 is ''not'' Matt Smith. Pic3 is disqualified ''precisely because'' it already serves as the infobox image at [[the Doctor]].  There's no need for duplication.  And it's not as closeup nor as bright as Pic1.  Remember, the goal of an infobox pic is to be as big as possible, as bright as possible, and as clear as possible. Pic3 just isn't an ''improvement'' on Pic1 in any of these regards.  Keep looking.  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}21:31: Fri&nbsp;20 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>
:::::: Huh. I actually considered the infobox on [[The Doctor]] to be updated to fit the more ICC images on [[First Doctor]], [[Fourth Doctor]], [[Eighth Doctor]] and [[Ninth Doctor]], and what'll result on this page. Is it really redundant when it's a composite?
:::::: Huh. I actually considered the infobox on [[The Doctor]] to be updated to fit the more ICC images on [[First Doctor]], [[Fourth Doctor]], [[Eighth Doctor]] and [[Ninth Doctor]], and what'll result on this page. Is it really redundant when it's a composite?


Line 34: Line 34:
ElevenWonderCB.jpg|11<br>A very standard, bright, tight close-up on a face full of a lot of potential emotion, but nothing that particularly dominates.   
ElevenWonderCB.jpg|11<br>A very standard, bright, tight close-up on a face full of a lot of potential emotion, but nothing that particularly dominates.   
</gallery>
</gallery>
:Well, there ya go.  Stuff to consider.  You don't necessarily have to like any of these, but these all represent the kind of tight focus we need to be going for.  The face has to be very tightly cropped, completely dominant in the frame, with no excessive framing elements.  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">22:37: Fri&nbsp;20 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>
:Well, there ya go.  Stuff to consider.  You don't necessarily have to like any of these, but these all represent the kind of tight focus we need to be going for.  The face has to be very tightly cropped, completely dominant in the frame, with no excessive framing elements.  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}22:37: Fri&nbsp;20 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>


:: I'm leaning towards 4 or 5. Not sure which better expresses him. Given the "happy but sad" bit from ''Closing Time'', it's arguably both at once. -- -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 22:50, April 20, 2012 (UTC)
:: I'm leaning towards 4 or 5. Not sure which better expresses him. Given the "happy but sad" bit from ''Closing Time'', it's arguably both at once. -- -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 22:50, April 20, 2012 (UTC)
Line 61: Line 61:
:As for the supposed "weird face" in #11, I can only say, '''This is Matt Smith, people'''.  His face is one of the most interesting and adaptable of all the Doctors.  He's going to look "odd", on some level, in just about every image.  The dude just has a weird face that looks a little bit different in every light, every emotion.  These aren't "unfair" pictures taken of an "off frame".  All of them are the very best of a series of between 5 to 20 taken in very quick succession.  This is just what the guy looks like in these various scenes.  
:As for the supposed "weird face" in #11, I can only say, '''This is Matt Smith, people'''.  His face is one of the most interesting and adaptable of all the Doctors.  He's going to look "odd", on some level, in just about every image.  The dude just has a weird face that looks a little bit different in every light, every emotion.  These aren't "unfair" pictures taken of an "off frame".  All of them are the very best of a series of between 5 to 20 taken in very quick succession.  This is just what the guy looks like in these various scenes.  


:@Mini-mitch: I agree with a lot of what you're saying, but I don't think the bow tie is actually necessary.  After all, the infobox pic of Pertwee doesn't give us the smoking jacket and frills, the one of Four doesn't give us a scarf, and the one of Davison doesn't give us celery (though it does give us [[cricket whites]], which are ''clearly'' more important!).  Of course, I ultimately think that whatever we choose will probably have the top of the bowtie — just because it's so close to the chin — but I don't think it's strictly necessary for an infobox pic of a Doctor to have the trademark costume element.  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">00:20: Sun&nbsp;22 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>
:@Mini-mitch: I agree with a lot of what you're saying, but I don't think the bow tie is actually necessary.  After all, the infobox pic of Pertwee doesn't give us the smoking jacket and frills, the one of Four doesn't give us a scarf, and the one of Davison doesn't give us celery (though it does give us [[cricket whites]], which are ''clearly'' more important!).  Of course, I ultimately think that whatever we choose will probably have the top of the bowtie — just because it's so close to the chin — but I don't think it's strictly necessary for an infobox pic of a Doctor to have the trademark costume element.  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}00:20: Sun&nbsp;22 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>
::A general note:  remember to judge these pics ''solely'' on the '''way they appear on this page'''.  '''Do not''' click on them and compare the "blown up" versions.  All that matters to the exercise of picking an infobox image is the way they look ''in an article''. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">00:27: Sun&nbsp;22 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>
::A general note:  remember to judge these pics ''solely'' on the '''way they appear on this page'''.  '''Do not''' click on them and compare the "blown up" versions.  All that matters to the exercise of picking an infobox image is the way they look ''in an article''. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}00:27: Sun&nbsp;22 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>


:::The reason I said not to 11 is because due to the fact that it looks like a publicity photo, it may result n edit wars. Also he looks strait into the camera, which is a big no-no for main images. Past the relatively unimportant catchphrase, the Bowie is very unimportant. I would argue that, if six is disliked, then four is the best choice afterwards. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 01:19, April 22, 2012 (UTC)
:::The reason I said not to 11 is because due to the fact that it looks like a publicity photo, it may result n edit wars. Also he looks strait into the camera, which is a big no-no for main images. Past the relatively unimportant catchphrase, the Bowie is very unimportant. I would argue that, if six is disliked, then four is the best choice afterwards. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 01:19, April 22, 2012 (UTC)
Line 90: Line 90:
13
13
</poll>
</poll>
Place your votes above and give your reasons below.  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">15:14: Sun&nbsp;22 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>
Place your votes above and give your reasons below.  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}15:14: Sun&nbsp;22 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>
::* 1 {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">15:20: Sun&nbsp;22 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span> As I've consistently maintained, the image doesn't need to be changed.  To me, it's not a "Gollum face".  It's the perfect expression of that in-between-happy-and-sad-state that Matt does so well. It's a fun smile, but if you look more closely, it's a bit wistful.  And I think the TARDIS backdrop is cool, at least for the present time. It subtly suggests he's the current occupant of the TARDIS, because none of the other Doctor pictures have the TARDIS in them.
::* 1 {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}15:20: Sun&nbsp;22 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span> As I've consistently maintained, the image doesn't need to be changed.  To me, it's not a "Gollum face".  It's the perfect expression of that in-between-happy-and-sad-state that Matt does so well. It's a fun smile, but if you look more closely, it's a bit wistful.  And I think the TARDIS backdrop is cool, at least for the present time. It subtly suggests he's the current occupant of the TARDIS, because none of the other Doctor pictures have the TARDIS in them.
::* [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 19:40, April 22, 2012 (UTC) 4. I take back what I said about 6 being the best, looking at it again, it is a bit '''too close.''' that said, I think 2 and 11 look about the same, really, except in 11 Matt's eyes are kinda looking at you, while in 4 his eyes look to the left. Also 4 is a bit less rotated, which just makes for a better image, also being from a better angle. I will agree that 1 is just a '''''BIT''''' too creepy for the main pic.... And I wouldn't go with the last one because there was a slight production error in the shot. (the blue in his hair) Out of all these images, 4 is without-a-doubt the best.
::* [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 19:40, April 22, 2012 (UTC) 4. I take back what I said about 6 being the best, looking at it again, it is a bit '''too close.''' that said, I think 2 and 11 look about the same, really, except in 11 Matt's eyes are kinda looking at you, while in 4 his eyes look to the left. Also 4 is a bit less rotated, which just makes for a better image, also being from a better angle. I will agree that 1 is just a '''''BIT''''' too creepy for the main pic.... And I wouldn't go with the last one because there was a slight production error in the shot. (the blue in his hair) Out of all these images, 4 is without-a-doubt the best.
::* 4 [[User:Memnarc|Memnarc]] <sup>[[User talk:Memnarc|talk to me]]</sup> 21:07, April 22, 2012 (UTC) I feel like number 4 does a better job of portraying the "in-between-happy-and-sad-state" that CzechOut described. Also, as I've said, 1 creeps me out. Which is uncomfortable for me, as Matt Smith is my favorite Doctor.
::* 4 [[User:Memnarc|Memnarc]] <sup>[[User talk:Memnarc|talk to me]]</sup> 21:07, April 22, 2012 (UTC) I feel like number 4 does a better job of portraying the "in-between-happy-and-sad-state" that CzechOut described. Also, as I've said, 1 creeps me out. Which is uncomfortable for me, as Matt Smith is my favorite Doctor.
Line 98: Line 98:
Okay, there were six people in the initial discussion period, there are six votes recorded as of 15:04, April 23, 2012 (UTC), let's move on.  This is a ''really'' minor issue, since there will inevitably be more and better pictures in a few months, anyway. There's absolutely no need to prolong this decision making process.   
Okay, there were six people in the initial discussion period, there are six votes recorded as of 15:04, April 23, 2012 (UTC), let's move on.  This is a ''really'' minor issue, since there will inevitably be more and better pictures in a few months, anyway. There's absolutely no need to prolong this decision making process.   


I'm declaring that 2/3rds of the participants to the discusion have voted against pic 1, which means that '''there is consensus for change'''.  The only two pictures left standing are thus 4 and 11.  Although only one person has actually voted for 11, its viability as a candidate is confirmed by the discussion upthread with people who either favored 11 outright or at least positively defended it. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">15:04: Mon&nbsp;23 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>   
I'm declaring that 2/3rds of the participants to the discusion have voted against pic 1, which means that '''there is consensus for change'''.  The only two pictures left standing are thus 4 and 11.  Although only one person has actually voted for 11, its viability as a candidate is confirmed by the discussion upthread with people who either favored 11 outright or at least positively defended it. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}15:04: Mon&nbsp;23 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>   
<gallery hideaddbutton=true location=center perrow=3 captionalign=center>
<gallery hideaddbutton=true location=center perrow=3 captionalign=center>
ElevenSomberVOTD.jpg|4
ElevenSomberVOTD.jpg|4
Line 109: Line 109:
11
11
</poll>
</poll>
::*11 {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">15:08: Mon&nbsp;23 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>  I'm going 11 in this round.  It's clearly the brighter of the two. You get a nice, rumpled bow tie, the full jacket, the interesting upward eye angle, the eye color, etc.  It works better on unmagnified wikiamobile, too.
::*11 {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}15:08: Mon&nbsp;23 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>  I'm going 11 in this round.  It's clearly the brighter of the two. You get a nice, rumpled bow tie, the full jacket, the interesting upward eye angle, the eye color, etc.  It works better on unmagnified wikiamobile, too.


::*11 [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 15:16, April 23, 2012 (UTC) for all the resons I have argued and mention above. [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 15:16, April 23, 2012 (UTC)
::*11 [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 15:16, April 23, 2012 (UTC) for all the resons I have argued and mention above. [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 15:16, April 23, 2012 (UTC)
Line 128: Line 128:
#It's my sense that there are more people who voted for 11 that would be okay with 4 than the reverse.  In other words, 11's negatives are higher than 4's — even though I think [[User:OttselSpy25]]'s objections to 11, in particular, are flatly ill-judged.  
#It's my sense that there are more people who voted for 11 that would be okay with 4 than the reverse.  In other words, 11's negatives are higher than 4's — even though I think [[User:OttselSpy25]]'s objections to 11, in particular, are flatly ill-judged.  


Therefore I judge 4 to be the "winner", and will be changing it over.  Because we've bothered to have a formal discussion about the infobox pic, all users are warned '''not''' to change the infobox pic until the beginning of the next series.  At that time, the consensus of this discussion will expire due to the presence of new material. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">05:01: Thu&nbsp;26 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>
Therefore I judge 4 to be the "winner", and will be changing it over.  Because we've bothered to have a formal discussion about the infobox pic, all users are warned '''not''' to change the infobox pic until the beginning of the next series.  At that time, the consensus of this discussion will expire due to the presence of new material. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}05:01: Thu&nbsp;26 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>
Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
765,429

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.