765,429
edits
Talk:Melody Pond (The Impossible Astronaut): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Talk:Melody Pond (The Impossible Astronaut) (edit)
Revision as of 03:24, 28 August 2012
, 28 August 2012Sorry for having to do this, but I'm being forced to change my sig, and clean up after it, by Wikia Staff
m (upholding T:HUMAN) |
m (Sorry for having to do this, but I'm being forced to change my sig, and clean up after it, by Wikia Staff) |
||
| Line 131: | Line 131: | ||
She's most definitely River. As Geek Mythology has pointed out, the Little Girl was shown at the beginning of the episode in the recap, implying that she's important to the plot. It makes much more sense for the girl to be River/Melody than not. (Then this nice piece of trivia can be added: "Sydney Wade played the daughter of Alex Kingston's character in TV drama ''Marchlands''.") [[User:D0ct0r11|D0ct0r11]] 14:43, June 5, 2011 (UTC) | She's most definitely River. As Geek Mythology has pointed out, the Little Girl was shown at the beginning of the episode in the recap, implying that she's important to the plot. It makes much more sense for the girl to be River/Melody than not. (Then this nice piece of trivia can be added: "Sydney Wade played the daughter of Alex Kingston's character in TV drama ''Marchlands''.") [[User:D0ct0r11|D0ct0r11]] 14:43, June 5, 2011 (UTC) | ||
::All that being said, we '''do not know for certain''' that the little girl is River. I'd agree it's where the information is trending, but we need to see it '''on screen''' before we include such statements in our articles. A counter argument is that if she's really River, why does (adult) River act so clueless as to the identity of the girl in the astronaut suit? Until we can answer that question, we don't really '''know''' jack. This article will remain under its current title, separate from the River article, until the mystery is '''completely explained on screen'''. As Moffat said in the attendant ''Confidential'', the "answer" we saw in AGMGTW was as complicated as the question. To him, any answer that's ''just'' an answer is boring. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} | ::All that being said, we '''do not know for certain''' that the little girl is River. I'd agree it's where the information is trending, but we need to see it '''on screen''' before we include such statements in our articles. A counter argument is that if she's really River, why does (adult) River act so clueless as to the identity of the girl in the astronaut suit? Until we can answer that question, we don't really '''know''' jack. This article will remain under its current title, separate from the River article, until the mystery is '''completely explained on screen'''. As Moffat said in the attendant ''Confidential'', the "answer" we saw in AGMGTW was as complicated as the question. To him, any answer that's ''just'' an answer is boring. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''14:56:19 Sun '''05 Jun 2011 </span> | ||
:::I agree that the answer is as complicated as the question, but it is an answer nonetheless. We have been clearly shown that the girl is River. There are many mysteries still surrounding this, but we've been given that part at least. (River's failure to own up to being the girl and acknowledge Amy and Rory as her parents during previous meetings don't seem particularly mysterious, given her spoilers policy.) | :::I agree that the answer is as complicated as the question, but it is an answer nonetheless. We have been clearly shown that the girl is River. There are many mysteries still surrounding this, but we've been given that part at least. (River's failure to own up to being the girl and acknowledge Amy and Rory as her parents during previous meetings don't seem particularly mysterious, given her spoilers policy.) | ||
