765,429
edits
Forum:Infobox: Species actors: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Sorry for having to do this, but I'm being forced to change my sig, and clean up after it, by Wikia Staff
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-header|Panopticon +header|Tech notes)) |
m (Sorry for having to do this, but I'm being forced to change my sig, and clean up after it, by Wikia Staff) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Mmmm, seems like that would open a can of worms for really long-lasting species. What character-less species are you thinking of in particular? -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 19:05, March 26, 2012 (UTC) | :Mmmm, seems like that would open a can of worms for really long-lasting species. What character-less species are you thinking of in particular? -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 19:05, March 26, 2012 (UTC) | ||
[[Category:Infobox discussions]] | [[Category:Infobox discussions]] | ||
::I'd tend to agree that actors for whole ''species'' would make the infobox grow to an unacceptable length. Just think about the number of [[Dalek Operator]]s alone! Plus you get into the whole question of who's in the credits and who's not, and do you then have to add a citation for all the people who aren't in the credits. I don't see this as a workable idea at all, I'm afraid. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} | ::I'd tend to agree that actors for whole ''species'' would make the infobox grow to an unacceptable length. Just think about the number of [[Dalek Operator]]s alone! Plus you get into the whole question of who's in the credits and who's not, and do you then have to add a citation for all the people who aren't in the credits. I don't see this as a workable idea at all, I'm afraid. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}21:02: Mon 26 Mar 2012 </span> | ||
