765,429
edits
User talk:Eladkse: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
No, you don't have new messages. Sorry for the false alarm.
m (No, you don't have new messages. Sorry for the false alarm.) |
|||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the [[Tardis:Help| Help pages]], add a question to one of [[Forum:Index|the Forums]] or ask on my user talk page. | Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the [[Tardis:Help| Help pages]], add a question to one of [[Forum:Index|the Forums]] or ask on my user talk page. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
{{Please see|Can we disable visual editor please?}} <br> {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} | {{Please see|Can we disable visual editor please?}} <br> {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}15:30: Tue 20 Dec 2011 </span> | ||
== Meanwhile in the TARDIS == | == Meanwhile in the TARDIS == | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
Heya :) Thanks for stopping by :) | Heya :) Thanks for stopping by :) | ||
Before I even read these articles, I gotta ask where you got the names. Is there an actual source for [[Meanwhile in the TARDIS 1|Meanwhile in the TARDIS '''''1''''']], for example? {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} | Before I even read these articles, I gotta ask where you got the names. Is there an actual source for [[Meanwhile in the TARDIS 1|Meanwhile in the TARDIS '''''1''''']], for example? {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}16:48: Sat 23 Jun 2012 </span> | ||
:Okay, I think that you've created these articles in a largely satisfactory way, techniclally. The infoboxes, layout and categories all seem to be fine — with a few provisos that I'll detail below. | :Okay, I think that you've created these articles in a largely satisfactory way, techniclally. The infoboxes, layout and categories all seem to be fine — with a few provisos that I'll detail below. | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
::*Note that {{tlx|TitleTV}} assumes your page is actually titled in the format <tt>Name (TV story)</tt>. Becuase this page isn't actually entitled that way, {{tlx|TitleTV}} is giving a false impression, which will confuse readers. Again, though, we need to establish via the forums whether this article should exist, and what name we actually want to use, before we get too bothered with how this template is working. | ::*Note that {{tlx|TitleTV}} assumes your page is actually titled in the format <tt>Name (TV story)</tt>. Becuase this page isn't actually entitled that way, {{tlx|TitleTV}} is giving a false impression, which will confuse readers. Again, though, we need to establish via the forums whether this article should exist, and what name we actually want to use, before we get too bothered with how this template is working. | ||
::Hope that was helpful and thanks again for your work. Please do remember to start a forum discussion about whether we should keep these two articles. Even if we do decide to revert to a single article, I'm sure your work will be largely preserved in the main. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} | ::Hope that was helpful and thanks again for your work. Please do remember to start a forum discussion about whether we should keep these two articles. Even if we do decide to revert to a single article, I'm sure your work will be largely preserved in the main. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}17:56: Sat 23 Jun 2012 </span> | ||
== No hard feelings == | == No hard feelings == | ||
:I appreciate the apology, but it's not necessary. I'm quite capable of compartmentalising issues I have with people. I've had strong discussions with [[user:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] here, for instance, but our working relationship is solid. Maybe we work well with each other ''because'' we know we can argue our respective positions with vigour. | :I appreciate the apology, but it's not necessary. I'm quite capable of compartmentalising issues I have with people. I've had strong discussions with [[user:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] here, for instance, but our working relationship is solid. Maybe we work well with each other ''because'' we know we can argue our respective positions with vigour. | ||
