765,429
edits
User talk:Metardis/Archive 6: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
No, you don't have new messages. Sorry for the false alarm.
m (ArchiveTool: Archiving from User_talk:Metardis.) |
m (No, you don't have new messages. Sorry for the false alarm.) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== New editing track == | == New editing track == | ||
Nope. No new editing tracks for at least another three weeks. [[:category:Stubs|Stubs]] would be deeply inappropriate, anyway. I'm not about to put every stub into [[:category:Stubs]], which would be required in order for the editing track to work. That would unravel the very fabric of the stub system. At some point in the future — and there's a reason why editing tracks are released as and when they are — I might consider putting one of the individual stub categories, like [[:category:Astronomical object stubs|Astronomical object stubs]] in an editing track. Don't count on it, though. The point of the [[Game of Rassilon]] is to highlight categories that are not otherwise highlighted. The stub templates themselves are arguably enough of a highlight. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} | Nope. No new editing tracks for at least another three weeks. [[:category:Stubs|Stubs]] would be deeply inappropriate, anyway. I'm not about to put every stub into [[:category:Stubs]], which would be required in order for the editing track to work. That would unravel the very fabric of the stub system. At some point in the future — and there's a reason why editing tracks are released as and when they are — I might consider putting one of the individual stub categories, like [[:category:Astronomical object stubs|Astronomical object stubs]] in an editing track. Don't count on it, though. The point of the [[Game of Rassilon]] is to highlight categories that are not otherwise highlighted. The stub templates themselves are arguably enough of a highlight. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}19:11: Fri 03 Feb 2012 </span> | ||
