765,429
edits
User talk:NileQT87: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
No, you don't have new messages. Sorry for the false alarm.
m (Cleaning up extra spaces after removing Timeline sections) |
m (No, you don't have new messages. Sorry for the false alarm.) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
If you have made similar changes recently to other articles, I urge you to please go back and correct them. | If you have made similar changes recently to other articles, I urge you to please go back and correct them. | ||
Thanks :) {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} | Thanks :) {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}02:01: Mon 17 Oct 2011 </span> | ||
==Cosmic Fugue== | ==Cosmic Fugue== | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
You seem to be having a dispute with [[User:OttselSpy25]] and [[user:Mini-mitch]] over the proper application of the nebulous "Allies of"/"Enemies of" categories. I think you have behaved conscientiously up to this point, in that you've made sure to leave both edit summaries and messages on people's talk pages, where warranted. Please continue to abide by our [[tardis:discussion policy|discussion policy]] and please don't re-delete the categories that have now been re-added by [[user:OttselSpy25]]. Instead, I encourage you to start a forum thread at [[forum:panopticon]] to bring more editors into the discussion. | You seem to be having a dispute with [[User:OttselSpy25]] and [[user:Mini-mitch]] over the proper application of the nebulous "Allies of"/"Enemies of" categories. I think you have behaved conscientiously up to this point, in that you've made sure to leave both edit summaries and messages on people's talk pages, where warranted. Please continue to abide by our [[tardis:discussion policy|discussion policy]] and please don't re-delete the categories that have now been re-added by [[user:OttselSpy25]]. Instead, I encourage you to start a forum thread at [[forum:panopticon]] to bring more editors into the discussion. | ||
Be aware that multiple reversions of the same act of editing can lead to blocking. There's no reason we even need to get close to that number. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} | Be aware that multiple reversions of the same act of editing can lead to blocking. There's no reason we even need to get close to that number. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}20:50: Tue 24 Jan 2012 </span> | ||
== Rumple to exspAin == | == Rumple to exspAin == | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
== Not me== | == Not me== | ||
You've left a message on my talk page that has nothing to do with me. I am not an active participant in your dispute with [[user:mini-mitch]] and [[user:OttselSpy25]]. I am just a neutral observer, who hasn't edited categories at the heart of your dispute. Your comment seemed directed at one of the two of them, so it was placed on the wrong talk page. Be aware that they will not have received your input. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} | You've left a message on my talk page that has nothing to do with me. I am not an active participant in your dispute with [[user:mini-mitch]] and [[user:OttselSpy25]]. I am just a neutral observer, who hasn't edited categories at the heart of your dispute. Your comment seemed directed at one of the two of them, so it was placed on the wrong talk page. Be aware that they will not have received your input. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}15:34: Thu 26 Jan 2012 </span> | ||
* I'm pretty sure I replied to OttelSpy25. It kind of bled over onto your page. "The dispute" was mostly a misunderstanding. [[User:NileQT87|NileQT87]] <sup>[[User talk:NileQT87#top|talk to me]]</sup> 18:28, January 27, 2012 (UTC) | * I'm pretty sure I replied to OttelSpy25. It kind of bled over onto your page. "The dispute" was mostly a misunderstanding. [[User:NileQT87|NileQT87]] <sup>[[User talk:NileQT87#top|talk to me]]</sup> 18:28, January 27, 2012 (UTC) | ||
{{TitleSort}} | {{TitleSort}} | ||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
But the average person using the site doesn't zoom the pictures, either out of lack of will, or — since about 20% of Wikia traffic is actually from phones these days — because they simply can't. So we do have to '''primarily''' consider the pictures '''as they look at thumbnail level'''. | But the average person using the site doesn't zoom the pictures, either out of lack of will, or — since about 20% of Wikia traffic is actually from phones these days — because they simply can't. So we do have to '''primarily''' consider the pictures '''as they look at thumbnail level'''. | ||
I'm not saying you ''can't'' get a two-shot — or at a push a three shot — but it's gotta be super, super clear. If you're talking about that four shot from ''The Two Doctors'' that I recently removed from [[Jamie McCrimmon]], it was in no way clear at thumbnail level. It ''required'' zooming out to make any sense of it. There are plenty of closeups of Peri/Jamie or Six/Jamie in that serial to choose from which will demonstrate the visual point you're trying to make, but do so in a much bolder way at thumbnail level. You don't need a four-shot, when a tight two-shot is available and will do the job better. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} | I'm not saying you ''can't'' get a two-shot — or at a push a three shot — but it's gotta be super, super clear. If you're talking about that four shot from ''The Two Doctors'' that I recently removed from [[Jamie McCrimmon]], it was in no way clear at thumbnail level. It ''required'' zooming out to make any sense of it. There are plenty of closeups of Peri/Jamie or Six/Jamie in that serial to choose from which will demonstrate the visual point you're trying to make, but do so in a much bolder way at thumbnail level. You don't need a four-shot, when a tight two-shot is available and will do the job better. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}13:36: Mon 23 Apr 2012 </span> | ||
