765,429
edits
Mini-mitch (talk | contribs) m (ArchiveTool: Archiving from Talk:Ninth_Doctor.) |
m (enforcing Forum:Prefix simplification) |
||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
==Regeneration & Continuity== | ==Regeneration & Continuity== | ||
I still wonder how the Ninth Doctor could have been surprised about his appearance in [[ | I still wonder how the Ninth Doctor could have been surprised about his appearance in [[TV]]: [[Rose]], although he obviously was at last 3 times on Earth before that in the same body. | ||
I don't think that he went on these trips during the few seconds between his first and second invitation of Rose to be his companion, because he just doesn't appeaer as if he had some adventures in the meantime. | I don't think that he went on these trips during the few seconds between his first and second invitation of Rose to be his companion, because he just doesn't appeaer as if he had some adventures in the meantime. | ||
He could have went to the Titanic etc. after he vanished with the Tardis for the first time during "Rose", right after he blew up the shop where the Autons attacked Rose. It might not be likely, because he obviously still had unfinished business because of them on Earth and in this time, but the Tardis might just have stopped at a few wrong times and places till he found the right time and spot again. | He could have went to the Titanic etc. after he vanished with the Tardis for the first time during "Rose", right after he blew up the shop where the Autons attacked Rose. It might not be likely, because he obviously still had unfinished business because of them on Earth and in this time, but the Tardis might just have stopped at a few wrong times and places till he found the right time and spot again. | ||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
:The photos could be present in Clive's collection, despite occuring in the Doctor's future, there's no problem with that (and even if he did see the pictures it would only be a minor pre-destination paradox). | :The photos could be present in Clive's collection, despite occuring in the Doctor's future, there's no problem with that (and even if he did see the pictures it would only be a minor pre-destination paradox). | ||
:The problem (well one of them) is that while the Doctor is some what surprised, there isn't any further evidence to suggest the proposals you've suggested, so while they are theoretically possible, they're not esablishable with continuity references. | :The problem (well one of them) is that while the Doctor is some what surprised, there isn't any further evidence to suggest the proposals you've suggested, so while they are theoretically possible, they're not esablishable with continuity references. | ||
:Equally the pictures could have been taken during his time with Rose, just because she is not in the pictures does not suggest that she is not present, like wise the aformentioned adventures could have taken place while Rose was with the Doctor, but not on those particular adventures (the Doctor could have dropped her somewhere, then gone off and had a bunch of adventures and then returned, months from his POV and only minutes later from Rose's POV), indeed this has happened before with [[Samantha Jones]] ([[ | :Equally the pictures could have been taken during his time with Rose, just because she is not in the pictures does not suggest that she is not present, like wise the aformentioned adventures could have taken place while Rose was with the Doctor, but not on those particular adventures (the Doctor could have dropped her somewhere, then gone off and had a bunch of adventures and then returned, months from his POV and only minutes later from Rose's POV), indeed this has happened before with [[Samantha Jones]] ([[PROSE]]: ''[[Vampire Science]]''), so it isn't outside the realms of possibility. | ||
:But unless it is actually stated in a Book, TV or comic strip story its only supposition and therefore can't be entered into the page. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:48, 25 August 2007 (UTC) | :But unless it is actually stated in a Book, TV or comic strip story its only supposition and therefore can't be entered into the page. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:48, 25 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
::''unless it is actually stated in a Book, TV or comic strip story its [sic] only supposition and therefore can't be entered into the page''. exactly. though no harm in mentioning that onscreen evidence ''implies'' something and noting how it does. --[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 20:44, 10 March 2009 (UTC) | ::''unless it is actually stated in a Book, TV or comic strip story its [sic] only supposition and therefore can't be entered into the page''. exactly. though no harm in mentioning that onscreen evidence ''implies'' something and noting how it does. --[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 20:44, 10 March 2009 (UTC) |