765,429
edits
Talk:Rose Tyler/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
enforcing Forum:Prefix simplification
m (ArchiveTool: Archiving from Talk:Rose_Tyler.) |
m (enforcing Forum:Prefix simplification) |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
:Has anyone actually checked whether or not the sun is in the sign of Aries 27th of April in the year 200100? There is, after all, procession of the equinoxes to take into account, and as I understand it the date on which a sun sign ends progresses further into the year each year, albeit very slowly. If, by the year 200081, they have adjusted the dates, then it's very possible, even likely, that the year of birth that would be assumed for a 19-year-old girl in 200100, given her birthday on April 27th, would very certainly be in the sign of Aries. Additionally, since Rose would have never volunteered this information, it could have been extrapolated from a cellular sample. In that case, it could be inaccurate for all sorts of reasons, not limited to background temporal radiation or the fact that you quite simply cannot use any form of cellular chronological dating technique on something that has travelled through time. [[Special:Contributions/173.12.172.149|173.12.172.149]] 00:38, September 24, 2009 (UTC) | :Has anyone actually checked whether or not the sun is in the sign of Aries 27th of April in the year 200100? There is, after all, procession of the equinoxes to take into account, and as I understand it the date on which a sun sign ends progresses further into the year each year, albeit very slowly. If, by the year 200081, they have adjusted the dates, then it's very possible, even likely, that the year of birth that would be assumed for a 19-year-old girl in 200100, given her birthday on April 27th, would very certainly be in the sign of Aries. Additionally, since Rose would have never volunteered this information, it could have been extrapolated from a cellular sample. In that case, it could be inaccurate for all sorts of reasons, not limited to background temporal radiation or the fact that you quite simply cannot use any form of cellular chronological dating technique on something that has travelled through time. [[Special:Contributions/173.12.172.149|173.12.172.149]] 00:38, September 24, 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Living Alone?== | ==Living Alone?== | ||
Weren't the events of [[ | Weren't the events of [[TV]]: [[Stolen Earth]]/[[Journey's End]] rewritten? Wouldn't of the Duplicate Doctor never been made? ~ [[User:BillyWilliam3rd|BillyWilliam3rd]] | ||
== Series 5 == | == Series 5 == | ||
