Bureaucrats, content-moderator, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, threadmoderator
85,404
edits
Line 477: | Line 477: | ||
:::::Right, sorry CzechOut, totally missed what is kinda obvious. | :::::Right, sorry CzechOut, totally missed what is kinda obvious. | ||
:::::[[PODCOM]] and [[DVDCOM]] do make more sense and are closer to our user words idea of prefixes and they're under the 7 letters and [[DVDCOM]] can cover the in-vision as well. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 06:43, September 18, 2012 (UTC) | :::::[[PODCOM]] and [[DVDCOM]] do make more sense and are closer to our user words idea of prefixes and they're under the 7 letters and [[DVDCOM]] can cover the in-vision as well. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 06:43, September 18, 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Nope. we need a separate prefix for in-vision commentary, too. Look at the chart at [[in-vision commentary]]. Only season 2 and season 5 have in-vision commentaries on the DVDs. Thus, any IVCOM from another season has a competing DVD ''audio-only'' commentary, not to mention a PCOM. | |||
:''Gridlock'' and ''The Sound of Drums'' have a PCOM, DCOM ''and'' an IVCOM. IVCOMs which appeared on the [[Adventure Calendar]] did not appear on the DVD, even if the DVD ''had'' an IVCOM already. Obviously, Adventure Calendar IVCOMs come out ''after'' the relevant DVD release. | |||
:By far, the most confusing episode for commentaries is ''Doomsday''. It is a bitch when it comes to figuring out which commentary you're talking about. There's the DVD audio commentary, but it's really the PCOM, because all the audio commentaries on season 2 came from the podcasts. Then there's the Piper/Tennant in-vision commentary on the DVD and the "producer's" IVCOM on the Adventure Calendar. I think for that one, we're just gonna have to invent something crazy like [[IVCOM]] (Producers): ''[[Doomsday]]'' or something. | |||
:Anyway, to answer your question TD, no, we can't just use DCOM to mean IVCOM. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 03:26: Wed 19 Sep 2012</span> |
edits