1,805
edits
Howling:Revisiting the why of the cracks: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Howling:Revisiting the why of the cracks (view source)
Revision as of 00:35, 28 September 2012
, 28 September 2012no edit summary
No edit summary |
Icecreamdif (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
:::::::::Icecreamdif: I'd take issue with the idea that those who saw ''Ghost Light'' have "no right to refer to ''The Big Bang'' as 'unintelligble nonsense'." We've every '''right''' to do that -- just no '''inclination''' to do it. I enjoyed ''Ghost Light'' when it aired. I still enjoy ''Ghost Light'' (a couple of times a year, on average). --[[Special:Contributions/89.240.243.135|89.240.243.135]]<sup>[[User talk:89.240.243.135#top|talk to me]]</sup> 21:11, September 27, 2012 (UTC) | :::::::::Icecreamdif: I'd take issue with the idea that those who saw ''Ghost Light'' have "no right to refer to ''The Big Bang'' as 'unintelligble nonsense'." We've every '''right''' to do that -- just no '''inclination''' to do it. I enjoyed ''Ghost Light'' when it aired. I still enjoy ''Ghost Light'' (a couple of times a year, on average). --[[Special:Contributions/89.240.243.135|89.240.243.135]]<sup>[[User talk:89.240.243.135#top|talk to me]]</sup> 21:11, September 27, 2012 (UTC) | ||
::::::::::I actually enjoyed ''Ghost Light'' a bit more on my second viewing of it than my first, but I still found it to be "unintelligible nonsense." Obviously we still have the right to call anything we want unintelligible nonsense, I just don't think that anything will ever be as unintelligible as ''Ghost Light''. The DVD special features did help though(I never got what Control was suppossed to be until I watched those, and somehow I missed most of the evolution subtext on my first viewing). Still, this conversation isn't really meant to be about ''Ghost Light''.[[User:Icecreamdif|Icecreamdif]] [[User talk:Icecreamdif|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:35, September 28, 2012 (UTC) | |||
