Howling:Revisiting the why of the cracks: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 69: Line 69:


::::::::::::So, if I'm defending Moffat against your charge, what am _I_ bothered by? He's the one who made me recognize what the problem was in the first place, the "ho-human, more alien invaders, what's for supper" thing, and he apparently just un-solved it, and he didn't even give us any episodes in between where we got to see how things could be better. --[[Special:Contributions/70.36.140.233|70.36.140.233]]<sup>[[User talk:70.36.140.233#top|talk to me]]</sup> 03:19, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
::::::::::::So, if I'm defending Moffat against your charge, what am _I_ bothered by? He's the one who made me recognize what the problem was in the first place, the "ho-human, more alien invaders, what's for supper" thing, and he apparently just un-solved it, and he didn't even give us any episodes in between where we got to see how things could be better. --[[Special:Contributions/70.36.140.233|70.36.140.233]]<sup>[[User talk:70.36.140.233#top|talk to me]]</sup> 03:19, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
::::::::::::Sorry, you've misunderstood what I meant by "indeterminate", which I borrowed from maths/physics. What Moffat described is a '''changeable''' history, not an '''indeterminate''' history. The state of a switch is changeable -- you can flip it from on to off or vice versa -- but both states are determinate. It's indeterminate only if it's impossible to know whether it's on or off. Something can be changing constantly but still be determinate. (I'm usually 89 but I'm 2, this time.) --[[Special:Contributions/2.96.31.113|2.96.31.113]]<sup>[[User talk:2.96.31.113#top|talk to me]]</sup> 07:17, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
Anonymous user
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.