Howling:River's Timeline in Light of TATM: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Howling:River's Timeline in Light of TATM (view source)
Revision as of 23:10, 3 October 2012
, 3 October 2012no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
::AthertonX: You're more than welcome here, as I'm sure everyone else would agree. I have a long wait for the next episodes and I have no intention of letting things stagnate around here. At least not as far as I can help it. I know '''I''' will certainly continue to post on as many of these topics as often as I possibly can, and I expect it will be the same for most of the regular theorists around here. Vote Saxon. [[User:Saghan|Saghan]] [[User talk:Saghan|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:12, October 3, 2012 (UTC) | ::AthertonX: You're more than welcome here, as I'm sure everyone else would agree. I have a long wait for the next episodes and I have no intention of letting things stagnate around here. At least not as far as I can help it. I know '''I''' will certainly continue to post on as many of these topics as often as I possibly can, and I expect it will be the same for most of the regular theorists around here. Vote Saxon. [[User:Saghan|Saghan]] [[User talk:Saghan|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:12, October 3, 2012 (UTC) | ||
::AthertonX: I concur. '''Anyone''' is welcome here if they've interesting things to say and/or has interesting topics to raise (& do it politely, of course). | |||
::Saghan: If -- '''if''' -- my idea is right, the Doctor probably will start with the records needed to spring River from Stormcage. That might not mean the Stormcage records themselves will be first, because it'd depend on all the connections. There'd be no point erasing things from Stormcage only to have them check up with some other database & find out what's going on. (That, though, is the professional database programmer side of me talking & I don't suppose we'll be taken through the process in detail. No reason why we should be.) Anyway, we already know that the erasure was done well enough to get River out & (importantly) to get her out '''unconditionally'''. She's not on parole, on temporary release, subject to recall or anything like that. She's free & clear. If (again) my idea is right, it would also mean that the pardoned River has just inadvertently started the process that will get her pardoned, which appeals to me. --[[Special:Contributions/2.99.198.167|2.99.198.167]]<sup>[[User talk:2.99.198.167#top|talk to me]]</sup> 23:10, October 3, 2012 (UTC) | |||
