Forum:P.S.: Difference between revisions

Forum:P.S. (edit)

537 bytes added , 3 November 2012

no edit summary

Trusted

34,029

edits

Revision as of 18:10, 3 November 2012 (edit) CzechOut (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:54, 3 November 2012 (edit) (undo) OttselSpy25 (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 33:		Line 33:

	:::If you want ''P.S.'' to count, then you will have to change the ''underlying policy'' by starting a thread arguing for the inclusion of all deleted scenes. We absolutely cannot have a situation where ''this single'' failed project gets to be counted but others aren't. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 18:10: Sat 03 Nov 2012</span>		:::If you want ''P.S.'' to count, then you will have to change the ''underlying policy'' by starting a thread arguing for the inclusion of all deleted scenes. We absolutely cannot have a situation where ''this single'' failed project gets to be counted but others aren't. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 18:10: Sat 03 Nov 2012</span>
			:::: Czech, if you still think ''Shada'' isn't a valid source then I have to say your insane. That discussion on the film's legitimacy ended with multiple users saying "... Yeah, why wouldn't it be a legit source?" Because you have to be 97.65% insane to say "Yeah, that one televised story that many count as canon? Not valid due to our policy." If we have a policy that does that, it needs to be removed. But yeah, Shada is valid... [[User:OttselSpy25\|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25\|talk to me, baby.]]) 21:54, November 3, 2012 (UTC)