Forum:Which one article is our best?: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Line 16: Line 16:
I think it's an article we can be proud to share with people who know nothing about ''Doctor Who''. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 06:08: Fri 02 Nov 2012</span>
I think it's an article we can be proud to share with people who know nothing about ''Doctor Who''. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 06:08: Fri 02 Nov 2012</span>
: [[Companion]] is a good suggestion. All your reasons are good but I especially like your fifth point about its unexpectedness. One thing I have against it (which is fixable) is that I don't think any page we send in should have one of the "please fix this page" tags, and this one has the "additional sources needed" tag. If we can fix this up, then I support this one for nomination. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:46, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
: [[Companion]] is a good suggestion. All your reasons are good but I especially like your fifth point about its unexpectedness. One thing I have against it (which is fixable) is that I don't think any page we send in should have one of the "please fix this page" tags, and this one has the "additional sources needed" tag. If we can fix this up, then I support this one for nomination. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:46, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
: I think the page is great because of it's non-biased appearance. Too many of our pages are New-Series biassed, especially images wise, or just TV story biased. This article, however, successfully has New Series images, Classic Series images, and comic images; perfectly summing up what we aim for in a page. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 03:28, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
Trusted
34,029

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.