Forum:Game of Rassilon errors: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 23: Line 23:
<div id=tech>
<div id=tech>
<div id=sfh style="color:black!important">'''''Update: 9 November 2012'''''</div>
<div id=sfh style="color:black!important">'''''Update: 9 November 2012'''''</div>
[[Community:User blog:DaNASCAT/Technical Update November 6, 2012|Wikia are reporting fresh errors with the Game of Rassilon]].  Although the icon display issues remain resolved, there's now a basic problem of math.  The Rassilon points themselves aren't being calculated properly, causing some long-achieved icons to pop back onto your "to do" list, while other icons remain unachievable by this crazy new math.  No word yet on when this will get fixed, but the fact that Wikia are putting it on the ''public'' "known issues" list is good news.  This usually indicates that the problem is higher on their list of priorities.   
[[Community:User blog:DaNASCAT/Technical Update: November 6, 2012|Wikia are reporting fresh errors with the Game of Rassilon]].  Although the icon display issues remain resolved, there's now a basic problem of math.  The Rassilon points themselves aren't being calculated properly, causing some long-achieved icons to pop back onto your "to do" list, while other icons remain unachievable by this crazy new math.  No word yet on when this will get fixed, but the fact that Wikia are putting it on the ''public'' "known issues" list is good news.  This usually indicates that the problem is higher on their list of priorities.   


The likelihood is that whatever work you do during this period of "bad math" will eventually get sorted out, since the game uses your contributions list as its basis.  Thus, the data is still in good shape — it's just the bit of code ''interpreting'' the data that needs to be fixed.
The likelihood is that whatever work you do during this period of "bad math" will eventually get sorted out, since the game uses your contributions list as its basis.  Thus, the data is still in good shape — it's just the bit of code ''interpreting'' the data that needs to be fixed.
85,404

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.