Trusted
34,029
edits
Forum:P.S.: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
(making the point I just rolled back a larger point on its own) |
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
::::The in-universe sources for ''Shada'' are the webcast, the audio and now the novelisation. Like ''Human Nature'', we can sorta squint our eyes and say that the same adventure happened to two Doctors — Eight on audio and web, Four in the novelisation. But the home video is a collection of deleted scenes — which means that even under OS25's proposed new language for policy, it wouldn't count as a [[T:VS|valid source]]. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 17:54: Sun 04 Nov 2012</span> | ::::The in-universe sources for ''Shada'' are the webcast, the audio and now the novelisation. Like ''Human Nature'', we can sorta squint our eyes and say that the same adventure happened to two Doctors — Eight on audio and web, Four in the novelisation. But the home video is a collection of deleted scenes — which means that even under OS25's proposed new language for policy, it wouldn't count as a [[T:VS|valid source]]. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 17:54: Sun 04 Nov 2012</span> | ||
::: Czech, I want you to know that I disagree and that I will figt until the end of time against any action to make ''Shada'' non-valid. However, please note that you are the greatest admin ever. After visiting another wikia, I know realise that you are awesome. That is all. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 00:59, November 10, 2012 (UTC) | |||
