Trusted
34,029
edits
Forum:Magnus, Divided Loyalties and more: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Magnus, Divided Loyalties and more (view source)
Revision as of 15:09, 30 November 2012
, 30 November 2012no edit summary
No edit summary |
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 398: | Line 398: | ||
(repeat) [[Special:Contributions/41.133.1.212|41.133.1.212]]<sup>[[User talk:41.133.1.212#top|talk to me]]</sup> 13:56, November 30, 2012 (UTC) | (repeat) [[Special:Contributions/41.133.1.212|41.133.1.212]]<sup>[[User talk:41.133.1.212#top|talk to me]]</sup> 13:56, November 30, 2012 (UTC) | ||
: No, it's more like this: | |||
: 41:I have real-world sources saying that Magnus from Flashback was specifically created to be The Master, and that the writers of the Brayshaw and Delgado serials say the Master and the War Chief are the same guy. | |||
:TW:Sorry, we only take narrative sources | |||
:41:(supplies multiple narrative sources providing overwhelming evidence that the Master is the War Chief) | |||
:TW:Uh, no, that was just a bunch of text, none of it suggested anything. | |||
:41:Not in those exact words, no. | |||
:TW:What? Look, if you don't have anything else to go on- | |||
:41:Ok, but then it never explicitly says in Divided Loyalties that magnus is the War Chief, it's only implied. By the way, why does it say on multiple pages that "Several novels explicitly state that The War chief isn't The Master", when in fact, '''one''' novel ''implies'' it, but in fact nothing ever states that explicitly? | |||
:TW:That was almost strait out said, with very strong implying. What you have, in the mean while... Was just quotes about the Master and the War Chief described similarly... | |||
:41:Ok, if we don't actually need explicit mentions after all, then what about the numerous implied narrative sources linking the Master to the War games, the Master to the War Chief etc.? | |||
:TW:Give me some and I'll listen! | |||
: Basically, you think that the most simple things are sources when they aren't you say that something not being stated out as wrong makes it right. You say that loose quotes and speculation are enough to write an article off of. You say a lot of things and we disagree. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 15:09, November 30, 2012 (UTC) | |||
