Howling:River may not really be dead....?: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:


What they did with Peri was very dumb indeed. What was dumb about it, though, was the way it was handled, not the fact of her survival. If River were to be brought back from the Library, it would need to be a major story in itself, not just an afterthought in dialogue. It '''could''' be made to work but it wouldn't be easy. It would be very easy to make it really, really cringeworthy. (I was 92 before.) --[[Special:Contributions/89.240.241.224|89.240.241.224]]<sup>[[User talk:89.240.241.224#top|talk to me]]</sup> 03:24, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
What they did with Peri was very dumb indeed. What was dumb about it, though, was the way it was handled, not the fact of her survival. If River were to be brought back from the Library, it would need to be a major story in itself, not just an afterthought in dialogue. It '''could''' be made to work but it wouldn't be easy. It would be very easy to make it really, really cringeworthy. (I was 92 before.) --[[Special:Contributions/89.240.241.224|89.240.241.224]]<sup>[[User talk:89.240.241.224#top|talk to me]]</sup> 03:24, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
For you that might be the case, but '''any''' episode that brings back a dead character is not one I will fully enjoy, regardless of how it is handled. I don't know why they had to ruin Peri's "death" like that. Even the actress herself preferred the death how it originally was - real. I'm guessing they must have been getting complaints that the death was too disturbing or something like that, but it doesn't really matter because I've decided for myself that the claim that Peri survived was a lie. [[Special:Contributions/94.72.226.48|94.72.226.48]]<sup>[[User talk:94.72.226.48#top|talk to me]]</sup> 17:07, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
Anonymous user
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.