Howling:River may not really be dead....?: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Howling:River may not really be dead....? (view source)
Revision as of 04:43, 19 January 2013
, 19 January 2013no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
I sure hope not. [[Special:Contributions/77.86.12.244|77.86.12.244]]<sup>[[User talk:77.86.12.244#top|talk to me]]</sup> 18:09, January 18, 2013 (UTC) | I sure hope not. [[Special:Contributions/77.86.12.244|77.86.12.244]]<sup>[[User talk:77.86.12.244#top|talk to me]]</sup> 18:09, January 18, 2013 (UTC) | ||
Personally, although I can see how River could be brought back, I can't see the need to do it. Because her timeline is out of synch with the Doctor's, any story with her in it can just be set before the Library, so far as her timeline is concerned. There's ample scope for that, so there could be lots more River stories without resurrecting her from the Library. | |||
The one & only reason there '''might''' be to have her somehow resurrected from the Library would be to provide a way for her to be given back the ability to regenerate, so that other actors could play her, once Alex Kingston is no longer available. That's not something I think either likely or desirable. (I'm back to 89 now.) --[[Special:Contributions/89.241.65.121|89.241.65.121]]<sup>[[User talk:89.241.65.121#top|talk to me]]</sup> 04:43, January 19, 2013 (UTC) | |||
