Talk:Mighty Jagrafess of the Holy Hadrojassic Maxarodenfoe: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
reply
No edit summary
(reply)
Line 4: Line 4:
:::I'm not inclined to count the cited website as fact (as it doesn't have any sources). In [[The Parting of the Ways]] the Doctor might have implied that the Daleks set up the Jagrafess at Sat 5, but that's a large step away from being enslaved. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
:::I'm not inclined to count the cited website as fact (as it doesn't have any sources). In [[The Parting of the Ways]] the Doctor might have implied that the Daleks set up the Jagrafess at Sat 5, but that's a large step away from being enslaved. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
::::So what do we do about this article, then?  Its lead is, from what you, me and Azes13 seem to be saying, without factual merit.  I'm going to throw up the prop delete on this one, cause the majority of its statements are legitimately, um, ''fact-challenged''. (How's that for a euphemism?)  '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]'''  [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 12:38, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
::::So what do we do about this article, then?  Its lead is, from what you, me and Azes13 seem to be saying, without factual merit.  I'm going to throw up the prop delete on this one, cause the majority of its statements are legitimately, um, ''fact-challenged''. (How's that for a euphemism?)  '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]'''  [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 12:38, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
:::::I just tried to rewrite the article, and was left with a sentence. The [[Mighty Jagrafess of the Holy Hadrojassic Maxarodenfoe]] article actually has more information, both about Max and the species in general, some of it on the Max article is also (I think) fact challenged, some of it anyways. So I suggest instead of a flat out delete, perhaps just redirect it to Max's page with a note at the top saying Max is the only one encountered (or something to that effect). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Tech, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Suppressors, Administrators
68,671

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.