14,790
edits
(→Rationale removal: reply) |
|||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
::I agree with CzechOut. There isn't any '''real''' fourth wall breakage (leave that to ''The Feast of Steven''), here in Sphere's there reason and the story works around it. Attack of the Graske is much more in the fourth wall category than this episode, we're still observing this, just as when we're looking through a Dalek's eye piece or through a camera within the story, the Doctor still looks to 'camera' and speaks is he talking to 'us' the audience or the character within the story, that for all intents and purposes is the hole in the TARDIS. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:53, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | ::I agree with CzechOut. There isn't any '''real''' fourth wall breakage (leave that to ''The Feast of Steven''), here in Sphere's there reason and the story works around it. Attack of the Graske is much more in the fourth wall category than this episode, we're still observing this, just as when we're looking through a Dalek's eye piece or through a camera within the story, the Doctor still looks to 'camera' and speaks is he talking to 'us' the audience or the character within the story, that for all intents and purposes is the hole in the TARDIS. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:53, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::Well I disagree. The Feast of Steven issue is problematic, I grant you. I suggest a compromise, which I have added, that the canoncity is uncertain. Just as Time Crash's canonicity was equally uncertain until Moffat said it was canon. Let's wait and see if RTD or Moffat say anything to this effect. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 20:29, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
==="The Blue Suit"=== | ==="The Blue Suit"=== |