Tardis:Feature Article nominations/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Line 67: Line 67:


==== Object ====
==== Object ====
 
*'''Opposed, but could be persuaded in future.''' I'm quite uncomfortable with a featured article still bearing the Wikipedia template. Yes, the MOS says, for some inexplicable reason, that it's "okay" to copy from Wikipedia, but then it contradicts itself by effectiely saying "but we really don't want you to".  So the MOS is not clear enough to be of use.  I theefore am just going on gut instinct here.  It seems wrong to "feature" an article based on Wikipedia's word.  We should have our own voice, and our featured articles should represent what makes us different from the Wikipedia Doctor Who Project. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]'''  [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 12:19, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
[[Category:TARDIS Index File Wiki]]
[[Category:TARDIS Index File Wiki]]
85,404

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.