Talk:The Angels Take Manhattan (TV story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→"Time Pardox" - C'mon: new section
(→Sheds) |
(→"Time Pardox" - C'mon: new section) |
||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
This may be worth inclusion. [[http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00zn6ff]] | This may be worth inclusion. [[http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00zn6ff]] | ||
: It's awesome, but I believe it was ruled out of universe as a result of a discussion thread. I think if it shows up on a later DVD as something other than a "cut scene" it can be reopened. --[[User:ComicBookGoddess|ComicBookGoddess]] [[User talk:ComicBookGoddess|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:31, March 26, 2013 (UTC) | : It's awesome, but I believe it was ruled out of universe as a result of a discussion thread. I think if it shows up on a later DVD as something other than a "cut scene" it can be reopened. --[[User:ComicBookGoddess|ComicBookGoddess]] [[User talk:ComicBookGoddess|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:31, March 26, 2013 (UTC) | ||
== "Time Pardox" - C'mon == | |||
"Due to the paradox created by Amy and Rory, the Doctor cannot travel back in time to visit them without destroying New York." | |||
Are we to believe this because that is just what the Doctor says? Because, I would think that the paradox might prevent Amy & Rory from moving forward and backward in time but why would it prevent the Doctor from visiting them at some point in their lives? Does it have anything to do with this nebulous "time distortions" which, for some reason, initially prevented the TARDIS from landing in 1938? | |||
I realize this was done because Karen Gillan doesn't want to make future cameo appearances on the show. But, logically, I don't see how it makes sense. I would think that both the Doctor and River could visit them, wherever and whenever they are at. | |||
