177
edits
Talk:Fixed point in time: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) |
Ensephylon (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
It's an interesting question, but talk pages are for discussions on '''how to write''' the article. If you want to discuss and speculate about the plot of the story, you can do it at [[Howling:The Howling]]. Thanks! [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:30, April 3, 2013 (UTC) | It's an interesting question, but talk pages are for discussions on '''how to write''' the article. If you want to discuss and speculate about the plot of the story, you can do it at [[Howling:The Howling]]. Thanks! [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:30, April 3, 2013 (UTC) | ||
== Pete Tyler's death == | |||
Are we sure that his death should be considered a fixed point? Preventing it created a paradox, yes, but that's because Rose's motivation for going back in time was to be there when he died, and if he hadn't, then she would have no reason for having gone back. That, coupled with the presence of two identical iterations of the Doctor and Rose is what attracted the reapers. I don't think they showed up because Pete's death being undone broke a fixed point. [[User:Ensephylon|Ensephylon]] [[User talk:Ensephylon|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:31, April 22, 2013 (UTC) | |||
