Bureaucrats, content-moderator, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, threadmoderator
85,404
edits
Talk:Cocktail: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Article needs vast improvement
(→cocktail or not list: new section) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:[[Screwdriver]] - no clue if it was referred to as cocktail or not | :[[Screwdriver]] - no clue if it was referred to as cocktail or not | ||
:I'm going to get back to the page now. This page will be much cleaner when I'm down. If anyone can check and see if some of these things are cocktails in narrative, that would really help. Also, if people want to start lobbing suggestions for subcategories of alcohol, well, we're sure going to need them. [[User:Anoted|Anoted]] [[User talk:Anoted|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:23, April 30, 2013 (UTC) | :I'm going to get back to the page now. This page will be much cleaner when I'm down. If anyone can check and see if some of these things are cocktails in narrative, that would really help. Also, if people want to start lobbing suggestions for subcategories of alcohol, well, we're sure going to need them. [[User:Anoted|Anoted]] [[User talk:Anoted|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:23, April 30, 2013 (UTC) | ||
::Not quite sure why you've put the infobox back, because you don't have a basis in the world for the appearances section. And if you don't have that, you've not got enough info for the infobox to exist. By the time the article gets whipped into shape you'll have a paragraph left on the page. The organisational principle of just having a list by type is wholly wrong — again, not your fault, cause that's how the page presented itself to you. But this isn't a category; it's an article. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 13:39: Tue 30 Apr 2013</span> | |||
== cocktail or not list == | == cocktail or not list == | ||
