765,429
edits
m (enforcing Forum:Prefix simplification) |
m (Robot: Unlinking "Dalek history") |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:By "in" Day of the Daleks, I mean more along the lines of "said in", "mentioned in", "prevented thanks to breaking the paradox in". Still might not be a valid reason to add, but my main suggestion for them is mostly for ambiguity between the two already recorded here. -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 19:58, January 12, 2012 (UTC) | :By "in" Day of the Daleks, I mean more along the lines of "said in", "mentioned in", "prevented thanks to breaking the paradox in". Still might not be a valid reason to add, but my main suggestion for them is mostly for ambiguity between the two already recorded here. -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 19:58, January 12, 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Actually, the reason I brought this up was related to | :Actually, the reason I brought this up was related to Dalek history and its eventual fate of being an index. As Tangerine's already done this now, I feel like bringing the topic up again. Anyway, as an alternative, I can see how naming Day of the Daleks' timeline works as opposed to perhaps the name of the war or occupation. Maybe [[Alternative Earth (Day of the Daleks)]], as there's already [[:Category:Alternative Earth (Day of the Daleks)|a category]] by that name. -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 14:34, January 19, 2012 (UTC) | ||
::That could probably work, as can be seen with | ::That could probably work, as can be seen with Dalek history the alternate timelines were the only things I wasn't really sure what to do with, and was just coming back to this discussion to post something like what you've said. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 14:44, January 19, 2012 (UTC) | ||
== Archivist's notes == | == Archivist's notes == | ||
Although this thread appears to come to some sort of conclusion, no action was ever taken up based upon it. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}13:34: Wed 02 May 2012 </span> | Although this thread appears to come to some sort of conclusion, no action was ever taken up based upon it. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}13:34: Wed 02 May 2012 </span> |