85
edits
Howling:John Hurt confirmed as 9th incarnation: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Howling:John Hurt confirmed as 9th incarnation (view source)
Revision as of 03:54, 26 August 2013
, 26 August 2013no edit summary
No edit summary |
Phil Stone (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Also, if you may remember, the Eighth Doctor's regeneration has not been seen. It's a mystery as to how he lost his life and the circumstances behind it which caused him to regenerate. Ever since the show came back to our tv screens in 2005, we have always assumed that Paul Mcgann's Doctor fought in the Last Great Time War against the Daleks and that his next incarnation was Chris Eccleston. However, with John Hurt being the real 9th incarnation, it could be that the Eighth Doctor didn’t fight in the Time War or simply perished during the early years and it was in fact the Hurt Doctor who ended the Time War. Hopefully the mystery behind the Eighth Doctor’s regeneration is finally explained within the 50th Anniversary Special… | Also, if you may remember, the Eighth Doctor's regeneration has not been seen. It's a mystery as to how he lost his life and the circumstances behind it which caused him to regenerate. Ever since the show came back to our tv screens in 2005, we have always assumed that Paul Mcgann's Doctor fought in the Last Great Time War against the Daleks and that his next incarnation was Chris Eccleston. However, with John Hurt being the real 9th incarnation, it could be that the Eighth Doctor didn’t fight in the Time War or simply perished during the early years and it was in fact the Hurt Doctor who ended the Time War. Hopefully the mystery behind the Eighth Doctor’s regeneration is finally explained within the 50th Anniversary Special… | ||
This is Moffat we are talking about. I followed the link to see what he actually said. | |||
Question: "Do you acknowledge the convention that The Doctor can only regenerate 12 times?" | |||
Answer: "Yes." | |||
Where I live, "acknowledge" can mean the same as "accept", but need not. If he said," Yes I accept that convention," one may understand it as above. But by saying ,"Yes I acknowledge the convention..." he is possibly only saying, "Yes I recognize that many people believe..." Which is not to say that he believes it himself.[[User:Phil Stone|Phil Stone]] [[User talk:Phil Stone|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:54, August 26, 2013 (UTC) | |||
