Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
35,119
edits
User talk:Cynical Classicist: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) (→Prisoners of Time: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Please stop removing the phrase "fan-favourite companion" from the ''[[Prisoners of Time]]'' article. You are removing it from the '''publisher's summary''', which is taken directly from the story itself and is therefore considered a quote. If the publishers call Rose a fan-favourite, then we have to leave it in. If you would like to discuss the quote, you can bring it up at [[Talk:Prisoners of Time (comic story)]], but for now your removing this phrase a number of times has resulted in an edit war, which according to [[Tardis:Editing policy]] is a blockable offense. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:07, September 25, 2013 (UTC) | Please stop removing the phrase "fan-favourite companion" from the ''[[Prisoners of Time]]'' article. You are removing it from the '''publisher's summary''', which is taken directly from the story itself and is therefore considered a quote. If the publishers call Rose a fan-favourite, then we have to leave it in. If you would like to discuss the quote, you can bring it up at [[Talk:Prisoners of Time (comic story)]], but for now your removing this phrase a number of times has resulted in an edit war, which according to [[Tardis:Editing policy]] is a blockable offense. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:07, September 25, 2013 (UTC) | ||
==Prisoners of Time== | |||
Hi there. Your recent edits to ''Prisoners of Time'' are being reverted by several editors here. The publisher's summary sections are added to the wiki as direct quotes to what is released by the publisher to the public. Your removal of "fan-favourite companion" therefore has been replaced several times because of this - despite the subjective nature of the passage. I hope that clears things up. :) --[[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revan]]\[[User_talk:Revanvolatrelundar|Talk]] 10:20, September 26, 2013 (UTC) | |||
