53
edits
Talk:Goth: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::For discussion speculation I would suggest [[Howling:The Howling|The Howling]]. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 15:29, May 20, 2011 (UTC) | :::For discussion speculation I would suggest [[Howling:The Howling|The Howling]]. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 15:29, May 20, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Hm. | |||
:I don't know about inferring all of that from ''Future Imperfect''. | |||
:In it, the Doctor realizes Gulliver has broken from the pattern of repeating Swift's lines, and notices - "That face. Long ago, he had seen it, presiding over hearings at the Celestial Intervention Agency." It seems that Goth has merely disguised himself as Gulliver in ''Future Imperfect'', and there's nothing to imply that he had been disguised as Gulliver for all of ''The Mind Robber''. Especially as he's in the Land of Fiction just to pick up the Doctor and take him to ''The Three Doctors''. There's also nothing that says definitively that Goth is the Time Lord from ''The War Games'' in ''Future Imperfect''. The trial isn't even mentioned. The closest is this exchange: | |||
:Doctor: "No! I won't stay! I won't be locked up by you and your boring bureaucratic… inkslingers!" | |||
:Goth: "That time is long in your future. And long in our past." | |||
:…which could just mean the Time Lords' past. Course, considering the Time Lord in ''The War Games'' is unnamed, it very well could be Goth, and it seems a safe assumption, but to use ''Future Imperfect'' as a citation (or to say Gulliver is always Goth) is going a bit far. - [[User:Constonks|Constonks]] 02:16, November 2, 2013 (UTC) | |||
