765,429
edits
Howling:The Valeyard and McGann's regeneration: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Howling:The Valeyard and McGann's regeneration (view source)
Revision as of 18:48, 21 June 2017
, 21 June 2017-spoilers_cat
No edit summary |
m (-spoilers_cat) Tag: apiedit |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Archive|The Howling archives}}<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> | |||
I've long awaited a possible new story involving the Valeyard, especially since we've been approaching his supposed time of appearance. (''"There is some evil in all of us, Doctor – even you. The Valeyard is an amalgamation of the darker sides of your nature, somewhere between your twelfth and final incarnation, and I may say you do not improve with age."'' -The Master) For a long time up until The Day of the Doctor actually aired, I was under the impression that John Hurt might be playing the Valeyard, but that's clearly no longer the case. (Though the evidence was still there that it was possible. Including when Matt Smith said to John Hurt "but not in the name of the Doctor".) | I've long awaited a possible new story involving the Valeyard, especially since we've been approaching his supposed time of appearance. (''"There is some evil in all of us, Doctor – even you. The Valeyard is an amalgamation of the darker sides of your nature, somewhere between your twelfth and final incarnation, and I may say you do not improve with age."'' -The Master) For a long time up until The Day of the Doctor actually aired, I was under the impression that John Hurt might be playing the Valeyard, but that's clearly no longer the case. (Though the evidence was still there that it was possible. Including when Matt Smith said to John Hurt "but not in the name of the Doctor".) | ||
| Line 21: | Line 20: | ||
Yes, you read that right. Moffat has announced that the Eleventh Doctor is, well, the thirteenth. Of course he could be lying again (or just telling the truth in a very clever way), but this could be genuine. And if it is, then The Valeyard is relevant to this. If what Moffat is saying is true, then the Tenth Doctor's violent regeneration was the one where anything Valeyard-related should have occurred. And of course the fact that it tore up the TARDIS could be something to do with The Valeyard. Any thoughts? | Yes, you read that right. Moffat has announced that the Eleventh Doctor is, well, the thirteenth. Of course he could be lying again (or just telling the truth in a very clever way), but this could be genuine. And if it is, then The Valeyard is relevant to this. If what Moffat is saying is true, then the Tenth Doctor's violent regeneration was the one where anything Valeyard-related should have occurred. And of course the fact that it tore up the TARDIS could be something to do with The Valeyard. Any thoughts? | ||
I agree as seeing as the tenth died protesting instead of accepting his death like the other doctors, it's most likely that this would be the time for the Valeyard to be created. Seeing that the Valeyard is only an aspect of the Doctor, it could have been created because of the violent regeneration. I don't know how but of course we don't know everything about time lords. Maybe it's a natural Gallifreyan thing to happen. But, if the doctor was regenerating in his tardis in the far future, how could the Valeyard have popped up somewhere completely different? | |||
By the way, this announcement has it's own thread where you can talk about everything it may mean for the show, not just The Valeyard. [[Special:Contributions/87.102.91.126|87.102.91.126]]<sup>[[User talk:87.102.91.126#top|talk to me]]</sup> 20:25, November 27, 2013 (UTC) | By the way, this announcement has it's own thread where you can talk about everything it may mean for the show, not just The Valeyard. [[Special:Contributions/87.102.91.126|87.102.91.126]]<sup>[[User talk:87.102.91.126#top|talk to me]]</sup> 20:25, November 27, 2013 (UTC) | ||
