68,501
edits
File talk:10docs.jpg: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::actually, they both look like publicity shots. two suggestions: the portraits could go in chronological order and the whopping big logo, which looks out of place... of course I think that you'd have to start a new image from scratch to "correct" these things. BTW, I've never seen the Troughton image before. good find! --[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 19:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC) | ::actually, they both look like publicity shots. two suggestions: the portraits could go in chronological order and the whopping big logo, which looks out of place... of course I think that you'd have to start a new image from scratch to "correct" these things. BTW, I've never seen the Troughton image before. good find! --[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 19:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::While we're sticking things on the wish list (I would have a go at fixing it but don't currently have any image editing software available), anyways, a new picture of McGann, even from one of the publicity shot, just not the one that's currently in the image. (Now that I do look at the original they do all look promotional shot-like), but the new 9 and 10 shots look less recognisably like promo shots. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC) | :::While we're sticking things on the wish list (I would have a go at fixing it but don't currently have any image editing software available), anyways, a new picture of McGann, even from one of the publicity shot, just not the one that's currently in the image. (Now that I do look at the original they do all look promotional shot-like), but the new 9 and 10 shots look less recognisably like promo shots. Also, yes if this is going to continue to be on [[The Doctor]] article the DW logo needn't be in the image. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
