User talk:41.133.47.166: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
::Please note that I have not addressed your specific edits at all. That is not what I'm interested in. I'm interested in seeing that the wiki's rules are followed and that all users are treated properly. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:17, January 29, 2014 (UTC) | ::Please note that I have not addressed your specific edits at all. That is not what I'm interested in. I'm interested in seeing that the wiki's rules are followed and that all users are treated properly. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:17, January 29, 2014 (UTC) | ||
Well, it appears some overly eager(euphemism) person blocked me for '''three months''' without a warning. Simply for making factual edits. Because let's face it, this site is full of factual errors and POV edits posing as truth. There is nothing I said that is not true. Okay, in one case I added the word "obviously" which was wrong, but that's a '''lot''' less than some of the rubbish that poses as fact all over this website. Your immature and abusive response of a three-month-block without a warning is indicative of the general behaviour and attitude of this website. namely, push one narrow-minded POV as "fact" and forcibly silence anyone who suggests a different take on the same material. Especially if their take makes more sense than your kindergarten-level 'interpretation'. You can believe whatever nonsense and factually inaccurate tripe you wish. My problem is that young fans may come to this ghastly website, read the lies ans bs on here, and actually believe that that is the reality. Which it most certainly is not. Your level of comprehension(or lack thereof) boggles the mind. This website poses as being a 'Doctor Who Wiki', yet is little more than the POV-pushing of a small, narrowminded group of control freaks. | |||
I have already attempted to discuss this rationally and logically. I was bombarded with personal insults, constantly told to "start from the beginning again", and of course met with some of the most unbelievable lack of comprehension and reading ability I have ever encountered. There was the usual double standard of someone taking some vague, unclear words, and deciding that it '''definitely''' meant one specific thing, yet when something explicitly stated something it was dismissed. | |||
And the other one of a glaring continuity error or impossibility being ignored with a shrug, while something explicit being dismissed as it '''may''' contradict something else that the person hasn't even read! | |||
Of course, since you were so abusive that you chose to give a three month block without warning, I can not possibly continue this matter on a forum any time soon. Which you knew perfectly well, because you don't '''want''' this discussion to continue, because you know you're wrong. So you prevent me from editing, and you stick to your flawed, inaccurate position as the "right" one. | |||
