Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/Blink: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/Blink (edit)
Revision as of 14:02, 13 September 2014
, 13 September 2014no edit summary
ChristopherO (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 194: | Line 194: | ||
*After The Doctor says that Sally needs to get the blue box back he says there is no more to the transcript but she had responded "How? How?" Larry was watching an angel at the time but wouldn't he have written that in later, being so obsessed with completing the transcripts? Also did Larry write his own responses in? Because every now and then the Doctor responded to things he had said but Larry never mentions writing what he says down. | *After The Doctor says that Sally needs to get the blue box back he says there is no more to the transcript but she had responded "How? How?" Larry was watching an angel at the time but wouldn't he have written that in later, being so obsessed with completing the transcripts? Also did Larry write his own responses in? Because every now and then the Doctor responded to things he had said but Larry never mentions writing what he says down. | ||
::I can't read shorthand, but I'd guess that Larry wrote everything, since he was noting the way it flowed as a conversation. They may have left off the end of the conversation purposely, or maybe the Doctor had a lemonade in his pocket and it spilled. We all know how fond he is of Lemonade. | ::I can't read shorthand, but I'd guess that Larry wrote everything, since he was noting the way it flowed as a conversation. They may have left off the end of the conversation purposely, or maybe the Doctor had a lemonade in his pocket and it spilled. We all know how fond he is of Lemonade. | ||
:::If Larry did finish the transcript the Doctor would have still said that the transcript was finished as he had to say his line even if it wasn't true because if he said something else he could have changed how Sally and Larry acted which could easily have caused a paradox. | |||
*When Sally is taking the key from the Angel the Angel behind her covers its face while the Angel by the window is looking in its direction. The Angel by the window then covers its eyes but the one that was behind her already had moved. | *When Sally is taking the key from the Angel the Angel behind her covers its face while the Angel by the window is looking in its direction. The Angel by the window then covers its eyes but the one that was behind her already had moved. | ||
*How come when the Doctor and Martha are back in 1969 and the Tardis is still in 2007, the Doctor (and potentially Martha) is/are not around in 2007 since the Tardis has not gone back in time yet? Wouldn't the 1969 timeflow keep going until the Tardis is sent back to change time again? Or is that too much timey wimey? | *How come when the Doctor and Martha are back in 1969 and the Tardis is still in 2007, the Doctor (and potentially Martha) is/are not around in 2007 since the Tardis has not gone back in time yet? Wouldn't the 1969 timeflow keep going until the Tardis is sent back to change time again? Or is that too much timey wimey? | ||
::The Doctor and Martha are in 1969 even though the Tardis is in 2007 because they didn't go back in thime via the Tardis, they were touched by an angel. | |||
[[Category:DW TV discontinuity]] | [[Category:DW TV discontinuity]] | ||
