765,429
edits
Forum:Eleventh Doctor access from Monobook sidebar: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Eleventh Doctor access from Monobook sidebar (edit)
Revision as of 22:49, 6 May 2012
, 6 May 2012Robot: Automated text replacement (-[Ff]orum archives header +archive)
No edit summary |
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-[Ff]orum archives header +archive)) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[category:out of date]] | ||
<!-- ~~~~ --> | <!-- ~~~~ --> | ||
Why isn't the Eleventh Doctor page accessable from the 'Doctors' dropdown menu on the main page?--[[User:Rotwang's Son|Rotwang's Son]] 23:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC) | Why isn't the Eleventh Doctor page accessable from the 'Doctors' dropdown menu on the main page?--[[User:Rotwang's Son|Rotwang's Son]] 23:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:well, because someone didn't add him, either on purpose or by accident. --[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 00:51, 5 February 2009 (UTC) | :well, because someone didn't add him, either on purpose or by accident. --[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 00:51, 5 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
::I think it's because the page is more or less still blank. | ::I think it's because the page is more or less still blank. We know that Matt Smith is playing him, but we really don't know anything else about the character. The article is still a stub, and essentially out of universe. | ||
::I think it's best to leave the [[Eleventh Doctor]] page off the list until there is something on the page about the character itself. | ::I think it's best to leave the [[Eleventh Doctor]] page off the list until there is something on the page about the character itself. Just one users opinion, though.--[[User:TheOmnius|TheOmnius]] 01:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::I don't mind adding it to the menu, but would anyone be against protecting it against IP edits (non-registered users), just in case we get a flood of users adding speculation to the article which would be in easy reach? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 12:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC) | :::I don't mind adding it to the menu, but would anyone be against protecting it against IP edits (non-registered users), just in case we get a flood of users adding speculation to the article which would be in easy reach? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 12:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::I think it should be protected from IP edits, but not added to the dropdown list until he actually appears onscreen. | ::::I think it should be protected from IP edits, but not added to the dropdown list until he actually appears onscreen. [[User:Taccer 07|Taccer 07]] 13:57, 5 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::::So far there hasn't really been any large edits that would motivate protecting the article, I only mentioned it because putting it in the menu would put it more in the public's eye and therefore open to vandalism. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::::Why wait? As there's no material that can really go up there, there's no need for IP users, or even most of us, to be able to edit it - at least for now. | |||
::::::It occurred to me that pages we put on the front page like that are essentially featured pages. The ones we link to on every page like that should be shining examples - or at least have information beyond the announced actor. Why take a chance on driving new visitors away or give them the impression that we've done less on the site than we actually have?--[[User:TheOmnius|TheOmnius]] 16:57, 6 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
