Forum:Magnus, Divided Loyalties and more: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-The Master/Rewrite +The Master/Rewrite))
No edit summary
 
Line 30: Line 30:
: This issue is obviously '''very''' important to you. However, you don't seem to care about the people you are trying to convince. This page is a long wall of text that will turn away many readers. Instead of copy/pasting the other arguments, try giving a '''short''' summary of your arguments. Then you might get more discussion. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:49, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
: This issue is obviously '''very''' important to you. However, you don't seem to care about the people you are trying to convince. This page is a long wall of text that will turn away many readers. Instead of copy/pasting the other arguments, try giving a '''short''' summary of your arguments. Then you might get more discussion. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:49, November 6, 2012 (UTC)


It started off at the [[Magnus]] disambiguation page. Basically, a post by Gary Russell stating that Mag(n)us from the Flashback(comic) was always supposed to be [[The Master]]. Confirmed by Warwick Scott Gray, the person who actually wrote Flashback(comic). And that there is nothing in any media which makes that an impossibility. Someone else then took that to mean that I was stating that the War Chief is the Master. Not my original intent, but he said he was "going to support me". This site's policy is that anything in a Target novelisation which gives extra background to, without contradicting the original tv serial counts. so, the long passages of text are from Target novelisations of [[The War Games]], [[Terror of the Autons]], The Doomsday Weapon([[Colony in Space]]) and [[The Sea Devils]]. As well as a real-world interview with Malcolm Hulke. This was then greeted with "But what about Timewyrm:Exodus and [[Divided Loyalties]]?" So, it was then a job to show how [[Timewyrm:Exodus]] doesn't contradict any of the above. Fine. Then came the biggie "Divided Loyalties". I had to give text from that book, as well as text from other narrative sources, showing how it can't possibly exist in the same universe. Another user appeared, demanding I take it to the forum, and locking that discussion. Someone else, then said that [[Death Comes to Time]] is excluded because someone supposedly said somewhere that it was non-canon. Despite no evidence. This, despite Hulke's and Russell's real-world statements being dismissed as "non-narrative"! The only way to get everything here, was to place the entire discussion here. Simply glimpsing bits will omit the development. The same person who locked the earlier discussion then blanked this one. They have also yet to actually state their position. [[Special:Contributions/41.133.0.18|41.133.0.18]]<sup>[[User talk:41.133.0.18#top|talk to me]]</sup> 15:00, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
It started off at the [[Magnus]] disambiguation page. Basically, a post by Gary Russell stating that Mag(n)us from the Flashback(comic) was always supposed to be [[The Master]]. Confirmed by Warwick Scott Gray, the person who actually wrote Flashback(comic). And that there is nothing in any media which makes that an impossibility. Someone else then took that to mean that I was stating that the War Chief is the Master. Not my original intent, but he said he was "going to support me". This site's policy is that anything in a Target novelisation which gives extra background to, without contradicting the original tv serial counts. so, the long passages of text are from Target novelisations of [[The War Games]], [[Terror of the Autons]], The Doomsday Weapon([[Colony in Space]]) and [[The Sea Devils]]. As well as a real-world interview with Malcolm Hulke. This was then greeted with "But what about Timewyrm:Exodus and [[Divided Loyalties]]?" So, it was then a job to show how [[Timewyrm: Exodus]] doesn't contradict any of the above. Fine. Then came the biggie "Divided Loyalties". I had to give text from that book, as well as text from other narrative sources, showing how it can't possibly exist in the same universe. Another user appeared, demanding I take it to the forum, and locking that discussion. Someone else, then said that [[Death Comes to Time]] is excluded because someone supposedly said somewhere that it was non-canon. Despite no evidence. This, despite Hulke's and Russell's real-world statements being dismissed as "non-narrative"! The only way to get everything here, was to place the entire discussion here. Simply glimpsing bits will omit the development. The same person who locked the earlier discussion then blanked this one. They have also yet to actually state their position. [[Special:Contributions/41.133.0.18|41.133.0.18]]<sup>[[User talk:41.133.0.18#top|talk to me]]</sup> 15:00, November 6, 2012 (UTC)


:Oh. earlier, the same person told me that "the burden of proof [was] on [me] to show that Round 4 Part 3 of divided Loyalties can't be part of the DWU". Immediately after I did so, he locked the discussion, saying it's "unfair to other users". [[Special:Contributions/41.133.0.18|41.133.0.18]]<sup>[[User talk:41.133.0.18#top|talk to me]]</sup> 15:04, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
:Oh. earlier, the same person told me that "the burden of proof [was] on [me] to show that Round 4 Part 3 of divided Loyalties can't be part of the DWU". Immediately after I did so, he locked the discussion, saying it's "unfair to other users". [[Special:Contributions/41.133.0.18|41.133.0.18]]<sup>[[User talk:41.133.0.18#top|talk to me]]</sup> 15:04, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
Line 89: Line 89:
: Now, 41, let's be a little more respectful to the admin. If it turns out the messiness of this discussion is my fault by the way, I apologise. 41, I expected at one point to back you up, but you'll have to organise your points before I consider still doing that. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 12:23, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
: Now, 41, let's be a little more respectful to the admin. If it turns out the messiness of this discussion is my fault by the way, I apologise. 41, I expected at one point to back you up, but you'll have to organise your points before I consider still doing that. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 12:23, November 7, 2012 (UTC)


I've chosen not to involve myself in this debate simply because I haven't read any of the sources in question. But from my understanding, ''[[The Quantum Archangel(novel)]]'' has appearances by the Deca. Hopefully that might be able to shed some further light on the subject and help out. --[[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revan]]\[[User_talk:Revanvolatrelundar|Talk]] 12:58, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
I've chosen not to involve myself in this debate simply because I haven't read any of the sources in question. But from my understanding, ''[[The Quantum Archangel (novel)]]'' has appearances by the Deca. Hopefully that might be able to shed some further light on the subject and help out. --[[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revan]]\[[User_talk:Revanvolatrelundar|Talk]] 12:58, November 7, 2012 (UTC)


:Well, what does it say? That's why I posted all those "walls of text". because that's what it actually says in the relevant books, magazines etc. I haven't read Quantum Archangel. Does anyone have the actual passage(s)? [[Special:Contributions/41.133.0.18|41.133.0.18]]<sup>[[User talk:41.133.0.18#top|talk to me]]</sup> 13:04, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
:Well, what does it say? That's why I posted all those "walls of text". because that's what it actually says in the relevant books, magazines etc. I haven't read Quantum Archangel. Does anyone have the actual passage(s)? [[Special:Contributions/41.133.0.18|41.133.0.18]]<sup>[[User talk:41.133.0.18#top|talk to me]]</sup> 13:04, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
153,401

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.