Tardis:Feature Article nominations/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
1,291 bytes removed
, 13 March 2009
|
|
| Line 74: |
Line 74: |
|
| |
|
| ==== Object ==== | | ==== Object ==== |
| #'''Opposed, but could be persuaded in future.''' I'm quite uncomfortable with a featured article still bearing the Wikipedia template. Yes, the MOS says, for some inexplicable reason, that it's "okay" to copy from Wikipedia, but then it contradicts itself by effectiely saying "but we really don't want you to". So the MOS is not clear enough to be of use. I therefore am just going on gut instinct here. It seems wrong to "feature" an article based on Wikipedia's work. We should have our own voice, and our featured articles should represent what makes us different from the Wikipedia Doctor Who Project. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 12:19, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
| | Rewritten |
| [[Category:TARDIS Index File Wiki]]
| |
| :* While i agree that we should have our own work rather than using Wikipedia's it would mean removing most of the previous feature articles of their feature status (not that that's necessarily a bad thing). [[User:Dark Lord Xander|Dark Lord Xander]] 00:48, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| # Needs to be re written so not copying from wikipedia [[User:Dark Lord Xander|Dark Lord Xander]] 08:29, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
