emailconfirmed, Administrators
129,644
edits
Talk:Steven Moffat: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
(→Add information to the page: new section) Tag: sourceedit |
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
basically steven moffat loves fish. the man loves fish." | basically steven moffat loves fish. the man loves fish." | ||
Quote from a comment on the youtube vid of the Christmas special preview. I didn't notice it until I read the comment, but now it seems so obvious. | Quote from a comment on the youtube vid of the Christmas special preview. I didn't notice it until I read the comment, but now it seems so obvious. | ||
perhaps include something about this in the "Monsters" section? [[Special:Contributions/173.180.24.7|173.180.24.7]] 07:14, December 26, 2010 (UTC) | perhaps include something about this in the "Monsters" section? [[Special:Contributions/173.180.24.7|173.180.24.7]] 07:14, December 26, 2010 (UTC) | ||
That's a REALLY good point, I didn't notice that..... It's kinda creepy if you think about it...............Fish............... Ech............... [[User:TheTARDIScontroller|TheTARDIScontroller]] 08:53, December 26, 2010 (UTC) | That's a REALLY good point, I didn't notice that..... It's kinda creepy if you think about it...............Fish............... Ech............... [[User:TheTARDIScontroller|TheTARDIScontroller]] 08:53, December 26, 2010 (UTC) | ||
how are multiforms,ecknodines,homo reptilia and star whales fish''' -Please Sign your post-''' | how are multiforms,ecknodines,homo reptilia and star whales fish''' -Please Sign your post-''' | ||
The multiform is eel-like. An eel is a type of fish. | The multiform is eel-like. An eel is a type of fish. | ||
| Line 43: | Line 35: | ||
== Is there a more unbiased way to moderate? == | == Is there a more unbiased way to moderate? == | ||
Hi guys, so I've had a post removed twice now (removed now NOT hidden so no record of the post will no longer exist except on my profile history) by moderator Shambala108. I have requested both a second opinion by a different moderator and an acceptable explanation from Shambala108 her/himself and neither has been provided, if this wasss to be provided im sure I could re-word my post so it no longer breaches the rules. I'm curious if we can come up with a more unbiased way of reviewing posts etc that's not based on a solitary opinion of in individual user who could in all fairness be just 12-18!!!? we should have at least two mods concur on a decision before being able to affect someone elses postings which in turn wont be publicized until reviewed!! | Hi guys, so I've had a post removed twice now (removed now NOT hidden so no record of the post will no longer exist except on my profile history) by moderator Shambala108. I have requested both a second opinion by a different moderator and an acceptable explanation from Shambala108 her/himself and neither has been provided, if this wasss to be provided im sure I could re-word my post so it no longer breaches the rules. I'm curious if we can come up with a more unbiased way of reviewing posts etc that's not based on a solitary opinion of in individual user who could in all fairness be just 12-18!!!? we should have at least two mods concur on a decision before being able to affect someone elses postings which in turn wont be publicized until reviewed!! | ||
