282
edits
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
:As Raukodraug has said it appeared on screen (perceived error or not) it's still in-universe on screen evidence, until obviously some in-universe ''proof'' comes along to challenge this. | :As Raukodraug has said it appeared on screen (perceived error or not) it's still in-universe on screen evidence, until obviously some in-universe ''proof'' comes along to challenge this. | ||
:Precedents are not proof, (how do you know by the way it was an error by someone making the props?). "It seems like" is not proof (in-universe proof can come from TV, comic, novel, short story, audio etc, anything recognised in our [[Tardis:Canon policy|canon policy]]). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 16:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC) | :Precedents are not proof, (how do you know by the way it was an error by someone making the props?). "It seems like" is not proof (in-universe proof can come from TV, comic, novel, short story, audio etc, anything recognised in our [[Tardis:Canon policy|canon policy]]). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 16:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
* The newspaper is a continuity error, it claimed to be on a Wednesday, so Day Five would be Saturday, yet children were shown to be in school. So the newspaper is a continuity error, making it's evidence null and void. [[User:MercM|MercM]] |
edits