Talk:Doctor Who (TV story): Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Ratings section question
(→‎Production Section: production sub-page)
(Ratings section question)
Line 46: Line 46:


:I've created the sub-page and copied the information across, but I'm not sure it should be kept, it's been wholesale lifted from the A Brief History of (Time) Travel website. If we're going to keep it it's going to need to be re-referenced with footnotes (properly, not just a weblink at the end) and with more than one source backing it up. I've chucked a [[Template:Inuse]] at the top of it and a cleanup and the base of the article, just to make doublely sure it's not yet mistaken for the actual thing. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 11:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
:I've created the sub-page and copied the information across, but I'm not sure it should be kept, it's been wholesale lifted from the A Brief History of (Time) Travel website. If we're going to keep it it's going to need to be re-referenced with footnotes (properly, not just a weblink at the end) and with more than one source backing it up. I've chucked a [[Template:Inuse]] at the top of it and a cleanup and the base of the article, just to make doublely sure it's not yet mistaken for the actual thing. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 11:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
==Ratings section==
* The Ratings section is missing some information, as it needs to be indicated if the number stated is the UK rating or the US rating. Also, since only one number is listed, which country is not included, the rating should be noted. This was primarily a US effort (they showed it first, and its success/lack thereof dictated the decision not to do another film or series), so the US number in this case should be emphasized.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.