Talk:Barbara Wright: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Novel)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Novel==
==Novel==
Although I have removed the reference to this in the two movie articles, where it did not belong, I think it's OK to mention the reference in [[I Am the Doctor: The Unauthorised Diaries of a Timelord]], provided it is marked as "unconfirmed" and "possibly apocryphal", relating to the book being non-canonical. I think it's interesting to have, and the fact the book was written by [[John Peel]] and distributed internationally (I bought it on Amazon in Canada) gives it a bit more prestige than the average fanfic. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 18:30, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
Although I have removed the reference to this in the two movie articles, where it did not belong, I think it's OK to mention the reference in [[I Am the Doctor: The Unauthorised Diaries of a Timelord]], provided it is marked as "unconfirmed" and "possibly apocryphal", relating to the book being non-canonical. I think it's interesting to have, and the fact the book was written by [[John Peel]] and distributed internationally (I bought it on Amazon in Canada) gives it a bit more prestige than the average fanfic. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 18:30, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
:I don't think this information should be included in the main body of the article. In the 'Behind the Scenes' section would perhaps be okay, but as the [[Talk:I Am the Doctor: The Unauthorised Diaries of a Timelord|discussion]] on the 'I am the Doctor' page has lead, there is some contention on where this book stands. It's a commercial product correct? So it's an unlicensed, unofficial and unauthorised work. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 05:19, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
Tech, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Suppressors, Administrators
68,583

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.