25,433
edits
Talk:Bert Walker: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Rename: yes and no
NateBumber (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(→Rename: yes and no) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Nope, just the novelisation. Since placing the rename template, I've discovered the rule (hidden on [[Talk:Miranda (Doctor Who)]], of all places) that we generally don't name pages based on novelisations, despite [[T:VS]] specifically saying that "if the [novelisation] gives a new fact not contradicted by television — such as a character's name — then it's allowed." Ahh well. – [[User:NateBumber|N8]] [[User_talk:NateBumber|☎]] 13:30, November 9, 2017 (UTC) | :Nope, just the novelisation. Since placing the rename template, I've discovered the rule (hidden on [[Talk:Miranda (Doctor Who)]], of all places) that we generally don't name pages based on novelisations, despite [[T:VS]] specifically saying that "if the [novelisation] gives a new fact not contradicted by television — such as a character's name — then it's allowed." Ahh well. – [[User:NateBumber|N8]] [[User_talk:NateBumber|☎]] 13:30, November 9, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:: It's not all that bad. The rule is both present in the Matrix Archives and allows for some freedom, see [[Thread:167022]]. But it is indeed largely based on the Miranda precedent. My current thinking about it, after looking at several cases quite recently, is that normally a redirect from a full name is sufficient. However, there can be options. For instance, [[Scream of the Shalka (novelisation)]] might merit a special treatment. There is pending rename from there too. So, if you find a full name in a novelisation, don't hesitate to slap a (slow) rename on it so it can be discussed. [[User:Amorkuz|Amorkuz]] [[User talk:Amorkuz|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:53, November 9, 2017 (UTC) | |||
